I assume they are saying would be allowable to make purchasing insurance a condition for being treated. They could probably even force them to sign a contract for and extended amount insurance not just sell them insurance to cover this one visit. They would not be violating their constitutional rights if they said pay us what it will cost or sign this contract for five years worth of insurance. The patient would then being making a choice to buy insurance or not be treated.
ObamaCare's Legal Death Spiral Continues.....great news for America!
- 08/06/2011 10:04:24 PM
1012 Views
- 08/06/2011 10:04:24 PM
1012 Views
I'm not informed enough to comment on most of this, but can someone explain that last line to me?
- 08/06/2011 11:25:49 PM
615 Views
just a guess but
- 08/06/2011 11:40:44 PM
514 Views
Yeah, and I guess that's what I was missing (see my response to Tom).
- 09/06/2011 07:13:00 AM
487 Views
A lot of the debate from the centered around how many of those people there are.
- 10/06/2011 01:15:19 AM
498 Views
"...the government mandate to have health insurance was unlike any law in American history"...
- 09/06/2011 05:24:56 AM
501 Views
wait....
- 09/06/2011 04:34:13 PM
540 Views
Guess what the "I" in FICA is; the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance program is insurance
- 10/06/2011 12:34:04 AM
647 Views
if you want to opt out just work for a local government
- 09/06/2011 06:01:06 PM
466 Views
a few high profile cases does not equal "most" in any sense of the word *NM*
- 10/06/2011 02:38:26 AM
197 Views
Actually, there's an even more relevant example.
- 09/06/2011 08:01:18 PM
597 Views
That's the best link I've ever seen posted anywhere on the internet. *NM*
- 09/06/2011 08:26:02 PM
192 Views
That's a very flawed example
- 09/06/2011 09:06:24 PM
484 Views
Did you read the Act itself?
- 10/06/2011 04:04:39 PM
457 Views
Yes, did you get the 'foriegn port' part of sentence, or did you stop reading after the comma?
- 10/06/2011 06:11:27 PM
461 Views
Re: Yes, did you get the 'foriegn port' part of sentence, or did you stop reading after the comma?
- 10/06/2011 06:54:29 PM
468 Views
It might help if you clarified what your point is
- 10/06/2011 08:05:30 PM
460 Views
besides it was still just a condition for a specific job not a blanket requirement for breathing
- 10/06/2011 08:36:07 PM
464 Views
In other words, this is as "unprecedented" as filibustering Bush judicial nominees (i.e. it's not).
- 10/06/2011 12:55:17 AM
467 Views
Oh well. Living in a shit hole country is something I love and a chance to change that is BS.
- 12/06/2011 05:21:25 PM
472 Views
