Check my response to Ghav for elaboration, but basically, your argument doesn't hold
beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 04:00:18 AM
No one questioned God's authority or power when they were setting forth the procedure for baptism. It's about making sure the individuals involved are in the right state of mind and spirit. Taking a shit in a baptismal font prior to performing a baptism or spitting on a child's forehead are clear and overt signs that an individual is NOT in the proper state of spiritual receptiveness. Why this needs explaining is beyond me.
If it's only about being in the right frame of mind, than using ANY clean water would be enough. My problem is that the idea of "holy" water means that it's different from regular water, which means it has properties regular water does not have. Can only holy water wash away sin? Or maybe holy water is just better at it than regular water, and a baby baptized in it is now twice as reborn in God? If you cross yourself after dipping your fingers in holy water, does that make God more likely to protect your from being hit by a bus than someone who just crossed herself with regular water?
Obviously I'm being facetious, but the point still stands. What is the difference between "holy" water and "normal" water?
I amuse myself.
A question on baptism
- 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM
1079 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection.
- 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM
847 Views
What I meant
- 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM
665 Views
I don't follow.
- 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM
653 Views
Re: I don't follow.
- 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM
738 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much.
- 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM
667 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much.
- 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM
621 Views
They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
- 11/06/2011 10:39:26 AM
734 Views
Re: They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
- 11/06/2011 11:53:53 AM
652 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM
695 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM
606 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM
673 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM
641 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM
822 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM
636 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM
872 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM
847 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM
654 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
- 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM
671 Views
Circumcision remains common among Christians mostly for symbolic reasons as well.
- 11/06/2011 10:48:48 AM
720 Views
Hm, I don't know. I don't think I know any non-Jews who are circumsized that see it as a symbol
- 11/06/2011 04:44:02 PM
814 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges
- 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM
743 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity
- 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM
768 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason
- 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM
707 Views
A first responce
- 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM
860 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one?
- 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM
853 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical
- 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM
689 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water
- 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM
757 Views
That is absurd.
- 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM
851 Views
It is absurd
- 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM
699 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move.
- 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM
777 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water"
- 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM
640 Views
The point is that it's a symbol.
- 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM
649 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol
- 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
716 Views
You are totally missing the point.
- 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM
806 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense
- 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM
778 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion
- 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM
1029 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean"
- 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM
666 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical.
- 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM
714 Views
Shrug. It was on topic.
- 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM
983 Views
The more I read of your posts, the more I think you fundamentally misunderstand religious symbolism. *NM*
- 11/06/2011 10:51:17 PM
286 Views
Let me clarify: your statements are absurd.
- 10/06/2011 10:14:06 PM
694 Views
Check my response to Ghav for elaboration, but basically, your argument doesn't hold
- 11/06/2011 04:00:18 AM
669 Views
You went from saying spit was good to saying "clean water".
- 12/06/2011 02:04:26 AM
612 Views
I'm completely consistent. I was just staying away from extremes for conversation's sake.
- 12/06/2011 09:02:02 AM
640 Views
No one from a respectable faith thinks of holy water as "magic water". Period. *NM*
- 13/06/2011 04:56:53 AM
299 Views
All I know, Is a Lutheran Pastor told me, b/c i was not baptised I was going to hell, and had *NM*
- 11/06/2011 03:44:38 PM
272 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site 
*NM*
- 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
320 Views
*NM*
- 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
320 Views