Active Users:497 Time:02/05/2025 06:18:06 PM
Because he's not bought and paid for scalius Send a noteboard - 18/08/2011 03:55:49 PM
He is not in the pockets of Wallstreet and the banks.

He believes in a balanced budget and small government.

He believes in the Austrian school of economics and is against fiat currency.

He's a non-interventionist who's against endless, unconstitutional foreign wars, and so his policy would starve the MIC.

He holds a strong conviction for states rights.

He's a proponent of free-trade, and rejects protectionism and agreements such as NAFTA which he views as "managed trade" that benefits the elite few.

The list goes on...

Bottom line: He stands for a constitutional, limited-role government which goes against everything the government is today. He's not beholden to special interests, and doesn't bend over for the financial elite. He exposes the fraud, highlights the hypocrisy, and so he's marginalized.

I would slave, to pave the way, to sink your ship of fools.
Reply to message
Ron Paul - 18/08/2011 01:58:37 AM 601 Views
Mostly defense - 18/08/2011 02:28:39 AM 564 Views
Ron Paul got 10% of Iowa last time and 8% of NH last time - 18/08/2011 02:39:41 AM 426 Views
FWIW, I think most of it is the first part of what Isaac said. - 18/08/2011 03:21:44 AM 533 Views
Well, this ought to get him at least a little attention: - 18/08/2011 08:30:47 AM 601 Views
Mostly because he's anti war. - 18/08/2011 03:26:33 PM 404 Views
I hit submit twice - 18/08/2011 03:39:40 PM 559 Views
Because he's not bought and paid for - 18/08/2011 03:55:49 PM 586 Views
Because libertarianism doesn't rely on religion. - 19/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 439 Views
I was being a smartass but not sarcaastic, I do think Paul is a fanatic *NM* - 20/08/2011 11:41:40 PM 174 Views

Reply to Message