Active Users:509 Time:19/09/2025 02:35:31 AM
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity Joel Send a noteboard - 13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM
Do you think states could handle entitlement spending (Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare) more efficiently than the federal government could? To facilitate this, increase of state government taxes and decrease in federal government taxes to properly fund the responsibility shift.

I mean, why not simply say blacks have voting rights and cannot be enslaved, then let VA, SC, MA and NY enforce that however they wish (or not)? Other than the fact that in states where a majority belong to a national minority opposed to a law the law would be ignored, of course. Apart from that, I see little more efficiency in collecting taxes from 310,000,000 people and distributing them to state governments by population to then further distribute by need according to variable state laws rather than simply collecting the money at the federal level then dispersing according to need as determined by a single system. It only encourages states to prioritize a locally more numerous demographic over more numerous and needy national ones (or prioritize no one,) which would be fine if they were not doing it with federal taxes.

Personally, I think the most inefficient tax burden is at the local level for the above reasons, which are consequently the reasons complaints about taxes get louder in areas with higher local taxes and more local government programs: People paying more local taxes are getting less bang for their tax buck, not more.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
States and Federal Government - 13/10/2011 05:08:14 AM 585 Views
No. - 13/10/2011 05:59:07 AM 369 Views
Re: No. - 13/10/2011 07:07:14 AM 361 Views
Re: No. - 13/10/2011 01:59:58 PM 350 Views
Economy of scale applies to every private bureaucracy, but not government ones. - 13/10/2011 06:53:44 PM 340 Views
of course economy of scale applies just like diseconomy of scale - 13/10/2011 10:38:45 PM 405 Views
And both are a function of size rather than government. - 14/10/2011 11:08:53 AM 423 Views
This is a ridiculous claim - 13/10/2011 09:44:35 PM 346 Views
you can do it with block grants - 13/10/2011 06:13:48 AM 330 Views
Believing the states can't do it, is not the same as saying the states will be less efficent or more *NM* - 13/10/2011 06:42:34 AM 135 Views
That is a BS argument - 13/10/2011 02:08:23 PM 337 Views
Medicaid is already state-managed - 13/10/2011 06:22:54 AM 434 Views
Yep, You're correct. - 13/10/2011 06:53:38 AM 353 Views
I think you just pinpointed my basic problem with vouchers. - 13/10/2011 06:36:58 PM 379 Views
Ah, Tricare - 13/10/2011 10:07:59 PM 338 Views
I pretty much agree with this - 13/10/2011 02:03:04 PM 340 Views
No I do not believe they do could do Medicare or Social Security more effectively *NM* - 13/10/2011 06:41:03 AM 142 Views
Care to elaborate? *NM* - 13/10/2011 06:55:21 AM 164 Views
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity - 13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM 409 Views
<Type Random Subject Here> - 13/10/2011 09:55:04 PM 350 Views
Because some things do not matter much with geography and culture - 14/10/2011 02:20:04 AM 329 Views
Yet again I must disagree - 14/10/2011 05:04:43 AM 350 Views
I agree, it's not necessarily that the need itself changes... - 14/10/2011 09:06:19 AM 326 Views
The first thought that came to mind..... - 13/10/2011 08:55:36 PM 349 Views
I disagree - 13/10/2011 09:49:15 PM 408 Views
Except when its time to retire.... - 14/10/2011 04:03:22 PM 327 Views
Absolutely not *NM* - 14/10/2011 10:55:01 AM 166 Views

Reply to Message