Active Users:330 Time:16/07/2025 05:02:51 AM
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity Joel Send a noteboard - 13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM
Do you think states could handle entitlement spending (Social Security, Medicaid, Medicare) more efficiently than the federal government could? To facilitate this, increase of state government taxes and decrease in federal government taxes to properly fund the responsibility shift.

I mean, why not simply say blacks have voting rights and cannot be enslaved, then let VA, SC, MA and NY enforce that however they wish (or not)? Other than the fact that in states where a majority belong to a national minority opposed to a law the law would be ignored, of course. Apart from that, I see little more efficiency in collecting taxes from 310,000,000 people and distributing them to state governments by population to then further distribute by need according to variable state laws rather than simply collecting the money at the federal level then dispersing according to need as determined by a single system. It only encourages states to prioritize a locally more numerous demographic over more numerous and needy national ones (or prioritize no one,) which would be fine if they were not doing it with federal taxes.

Personally, I think the most inefficient tax burden is at the local level for the above reasons, which are consequently the reasons complaints about taxes get louder in areas with higher local taxes and more local government programs: People paying more local taxes are getting less bang for their tax buck, not more.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
States and Federal Government - 13/10/2011 05:08:14 AM 570 Views
No. - 13/10/2011 05:59:07 AM 355 Views
Re: No. - 13/10/2011 07:07:14 AM 343 Views
Re: No. - 13/10/2011 01:59:58 PM 334 Views
Economy of scale applies to every private bureaucracy, but not government ones. - 13/10/2011 06:53:44 PM 324 Views
of course economy of scale applies just like diseconomy of scale - 13/10/2011 10:38:45 PM 381 Views
And both are a function of size rather than government. - 14/10/2011 11:08:53 AM 405 Views
This is a ridiculous claim - 13/10/2011 09:44:35 PM 330 Views
you can do it with block grants - 13/10/2011 06:13:48 AM 315 Views
Believing the states can't do it, is not the same as saying the states will be less efficent or more *NM* - 13/10/2011 06:42:34 AM 128 Views
That is a BS argument - 13/10/2011 02:08:23 PM 322 Views
Medicaid is already state-managed - 13/10/2011 06:22:54 AM 417 Views
Yep, You're correct. - 13/10/2011 06:53:38 AM 337 Views
I think you just pinpointed my basic problem with vouchers. - 13/10/2011 06:36:58 PM 361 Views
Ah, Tricare - 13/10/2011 10:07:59 PM 318 Views
I pretty much agree with this - 13/10/2011 02:03:04 PM 321 Views
No I do not believe they do could do Medicare or Social Security more effectively *NM* - 13/10/2011 06:41:03 AM 133 Views
Care to elaborate? *NM* - 13/10/2011 06:55:21 AM 157 Views
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity - 13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM 394 Views
<Type Random Subject Here> - 13/10/2011 09:55:04 PM 332 Views
Because some things do not matter much with geography and culture - 14/10/2011 02:20:04 AM 313 Views
Yet again I must disagree - 14/10/2011 05:04:43 AM 331 Views
I agree, it's not necessarily that the need itself changes... - 14/10/2011 09:06:19 AM 310 Views
The first thought that came to mind..... - 13/10/2011 08:55:36 PM 332 Views
I disagree - 13/10/2011 09:49:15 PM 389 Views
Except when its time to retire.... - 14/10/2011 04:03:22 PM 310 Views
Absolutely not *NM* - 14/10/2011 10:55:01 AM 160 Views

Reply to Message