It may still be a better option though, but I wouldn't consider it a likely great success story
Isaac Send a noteboard - 13/10/2011 09:23:16 PM
I think the medical care could easily be state managed, but Social Security would be more difficult due to interstate migration.
I'm pretty confident we could overcome the 50 state hurdle, we do after all do it pretty much all the time, but whether we should, and how hard that hurdle would be to leap, depends on what one thinks SS is or should be, a savings account or low-risk low-yield investment, or an insurance program, or both. If it's the former it doesn't matter who runs it, fed, state, or private anymore than it matters if you have a bank account in Kentucky and now live in Florida, you just transfer the funds... or leave them there, doesn't matter and isn't hard either way. If it's insurance, then that's trickier but people need to remember that insurance is a system in which one on average pays in more than you payout, and accept that you won't see $3 return on $1 investment but rather $0.8 return on $1. And people need to decide which one they want, but it doesn't have to be all-in, we can do both, and people pick which, or we can let them do both in whatever ratio they want. Sliding into a tangent there but the savings/invest option doesn't really matter who does it, the insurance one kinda does but still isn't a huge hurdle and that one is one where 50 heads vs 1 could yield us dividends, so to speak, since it is actually possible to decrease costs of services that almost everyone uses by bulk purchase.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
- Albert Einstein
King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
States and Federal Government
13/10/2011 05:08:14 AM
- 570 Views
No.
13/10/2011 05:59:07 AM
- 355 Views
Re: No.
13/10/2011 07:07:14 AM
- 343 Views
Re: No.
13/10/2011 01:59:58 PM
- 335 Views
Economy of scale applies to every private bureaucracy, but not government ones.
13/10/2011 06:53:44 PM
- 324 Views

you can do it with block grants
13/10/2011 06:13:48 AM
- 315 Views
Believing the states can't do it, is not the same as saying the states will be less efficent or more *NM*
13/10/2011 06:42:34 AM
- 129 Views
Medicaid is already state-managed
13/10/2011 06:22:54 AM
- 417 Views

I pretty much agree with this
13/10/2011 02:03:04 PM
- 321 Views
It may still be a better option though, but I wouldn't consider it a likely great success story
13/10/2011 09:23:16 PM
- 407 Views
No I do not believe they do could do Medicare or Social Security more effectively *NM*
13/10/2011 06:41:03 AM
- 134 Views
Care to elaborate? *NM*
13/10/2011 06:55:21 AM
- 157 Views
Would you rather have 50 insurance companies with different pay structures or 1?
14/10/2011 02:14:23 AM
- 332 Views
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity
13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM
- 394 Views
<Type Random Subject Here>
13/10/2011 09:55:04 PM
- 333 Views
Because some things do not matter much with geography and culture
14/10/2011 02:20:04 AM
- 313 Views
Yet again I must disagree
14/10/2011 05:04:43 AM
- 331 Views
Think about fire, how much need will Alaska have for fire trucks? *NM*
14/10/2011 12:30:05 PM
- 131 Views
Some issues are exclusively local and best handled there, as are some resources.
14/10/2011 11:22:46 AM
- 336 Views
The first thought that came to mind.....
13/10/2011 08:55:36 PM
- 332 Views
Depends on the state and its legislators, doesn't it? But, generally, no. *NM*
14/10/2011 06:50:13 PM
- 133 Views
Pick your rapist and tell me why it makes a damn bit of difference. *NM*
15/10/2011 05:06:50 PM
- 142 Views