Active Users:403 Time:01/07/2025 05:28:49 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I'm just not interested in every detail of your lives. NSSP tags and Journals exist for a reason. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 23/10/2011 08:39:06 AM
The twit box has always been an ugly little addition to the site, but if we have to have it in such a prominent position, we may as well keep it to information about books and authors.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 23/10/2011 at 08:45:32 AM
Reply to message
I love you guys, but I'm phenomenally uninterested in the status of your bartabs. Ghavrel - 22/10/2011 01:12:00 PM 856 Views
So, there are occasions of other subjects in which you are interested in the tweet box? *NM* TaskmasterJack - 22/10/2011 02:07:00 PM 138 Views
Sanderson tweeting about being nearly done with being nearly done with WoT was good. Joel - 22/10/2011 03:11:43 PM 363 Views
Not really. But the self-absorbed vapidity of some really aggravates me. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/10/2011 09:00:53 PM 154 Views
Perhaps you don't understand the purpose of Twitter. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 22/10/2011 11:45:18 PM 183 Views
Or he does, and that's why he's not on there... *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 01:48:57 PM 146 Views
I don't notice them 85% of the time, so they don't bother me. *NM* Avendesora - 22/10/2011 09:54:38 PM 211 Views
I'm interested in their bartabs *NM* Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 02:43:46 AM 180 Views
Follow them on Twitter then. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:37:53 AM 146 Views
I already do Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 10:03:37 AM 375 Views
Web 2.0 is a vapid scam, and Twitter's existence is contrary to a discussion forum. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 10:23:09 AM 146 Views
By participating in this thread you've smeared yourself in Web2.0 jelly and danced a Rumba Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 10:26:00 AM 391 Views
You kidding? Behind the scenes, yeah, probably, but RAFO's style is like Web 0.5. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 10:59:05 AM 145 Views
You are such a grump. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 08:21:33 AM 369 Views
I'm just not interested in every detail of your lives. NSSP tags and Journals exist for a reason. Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:39:06 AM 445 Views
I didn't even know there was a tweet box Helene - 23/10/2011 08:48:28 AM 373 Views
You're not getting every little detail of our lives. You're getting little GATHERING reports. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 04:10:00 PM 394 Views
Maybe the point should be listened to, then. Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:35:44 PM 368 Views
Patience is a virtue. Rebekah - 24/10/2011 08:16:52 AM 372 Views
He's right though. ranagrande - 23/10/2011 09:34:05 AM 410 Views
Yes, and that point has been made before. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 04:11:50 PM 428 Views
I have seen the question a few times. What I don't recall seeing is an answer. Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 01:53:31 PM 393 Views
Ben gave me a sort-of answer once. Nate - 24/10/2011 05:05:32 PM 365 Views
See, to me Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 05:27:45 PM 412 Views
Re: See, to me TaskmasterJack - 25/10/2011 12:00:21 AM 310 Views
I thought it had been. *NM* Rebekah - 24/10/2011 07:01:53 PM 177 Views
I'd agree if it was twelve tweets or if they started commenting Rugby from the pub via Twitter ironclad - 23/10/2011 04:29:32 PM 432 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes