Active Users:676 Time:12/03/2026 10:09:31 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Ben gave me a sort-of answer once. Nate Send a noteboard - 24/10/2011 05:05:32 PM
Back when I was first harping on it. He said that he was considering what to do about it. Personally I'd just like to see it bumped beneath the Quote of the Moment and then let alone. If it were turned into an option you could disable with a premium account that would be fine too. But I do think there's a value to it; I just don't think it should be so prominent when it only changes maybe once per day. Put it beneath the Quote, people can check it once per day and then it's more out of the way.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
I love you guys, but I'm phenomenally uninterested in the status of your bartabs. Ghavrel - 22/10/2011 01:12:00 PM 904 Views
So, there are occasions of other subjects in which you are interested in the tweet box? *NM* TaskmasterJack - 22/10/2011 02:07:00 PM 159 Views
Sanderson tweeting about being nearly done with being nearly done with WoT was good. Joel - 22/10/2011 03:11:43 PM 428 Views
Not really. But the self-absorbed vapidity of some really aggravates me. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/10/2011 09:00:53 PM 174 Views
Perhaps you don't understand the purpose of Twitter. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 22/10/2011 11:45:18 PM 206 Views
Or he does, and that's why he's not on there... *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 01:48:57 PM 164 Views
I don't notice them 85% of the time, so they don't bother me. *NM* Avendesora - 22/10/2011 09:54:38 PM 232 Views
I'm interested in their bartabs *NM* Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 02:43:46 AM 206 Views
Follow them on Twitter then. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:37:53 AM 166 Views
I already do Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 10:03:37 AM 433 Views
Web 2.0 is a vapid scam, and Twitter's existence is contrary to a discussion forum. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 10:23:09 AM 167 Views
By participating in this thread you've smeared yourself in Web2.0 jelly and danced a Rumba Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 10:26:00 AM 448 Views
You kidding? Behind the scenes, yeah, probably, but RAFO's style is like Web 0.5. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 10:59:05 AM 164 Views
You are such a grump. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 08:21:33 AM 428 Views
I'm just not interested in every detail of your lives. NSSP tags and Journals exist for a reason. Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:39:06 AM 505 Views
I didn't even know there was a tweet box Helene - 23/10/2011 08:48:28 AM 429 Views
You're not getting every little detail of our lives. You're getting little GATHERING reports. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 04:10:00 PM 464 Views
Maybe the point should be listened to, then. Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:35:44 PM 427 Views
Patience is a virtue. Rebekah - 24/10/2011 08:16:52 AM 425 Views
He's right though. ranagrande - 23/10/2011 09:34:05 AM 465 Views
Yes, and that point has been made before. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 04:11:50 PM 510 Views
I have seen the question a few times. What I don't recall seeing is an answer. Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 01:53:31 PM 450 Views
Ben gave me a sort-of answer once. Nate - 24/10/2011 05:05:32 PM 431 Views
See, to me Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 05:27:45 PM 463 Views
Re: See, to me TaskmasterJack - 25/10/2011 12:00:21 AM 377 Views
I thought it had been. *NM* Rebekah - 24/10/2011 07:01:53 PM 195 Views
I'd agree if it was twelve tweets or if they started commenting Rugby from the pub via Twitter ironclad - 23/10/2011 04:29:32 PM 486 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes