Active Users:493 Time:19/11/2025 03:54:52 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I want to reread Lamb: The story of Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal now beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 01/11/2011 11:38:26 PM
If in an alternate reality you were confronted by a mob of Jesus clones, and you wanted to say, "Oh shit, look at all those ________!", what would you use besides "Jesuses"? After all, I'm fairly certain other names follow a similar form. "There are a lot of Guses in this town." "Did you see all those Samuses at that cosplay convention?" Unless Jesus as a name has a special grammatical convention for plurality? Such as Jesu or something? Or perhaps it is like a moose and you would simply say, "Look at all those Jesus!" That seems potentially grammatically vague. Surely you don't mean to imply that it should be converted like a Latin word and be Jesi? I would have thought that would not apply to proper names. Though that is a good question. If Claudius were cloned, would you say, "Holy shit, look at all those Claudii!"?

What with it being a family name (calling it "last name" is a bit confusing in the Roman naming system), the plural was sometimes used when referring to an entire family, or to several people (the most famous example is probably "the Gracchi", the two brothers Gracchus in the second century B.C.).

Actual first names are a different story, of course.

Though really, since Jesus' native language was Aramaic and his friends and family called him something closer to Joshua than to Jesus (I don't recall what exactly it is in Hebrew/Aramaic), it seems a little absurd to go look at Latin plurals - if you're gonna translate his name to another language anyhow, you might as well just stick with the English plurals.

I think possibly I'm taking this question even more too seriously than you did... :P And now I'm wondering about the grammaticality or lack thereof of the previous sentence, which probably means I'm starting to ramble and should leave it at this. ;)
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
It's so weird trying to explain Halloween to people who didn't grow up with it beetnemesis - 01/11/2011 02:26:52 PM 737 Views
For a sec I was gonna go into the specifics for you... Dannymac - 01/11/2011 04:32:18 PM 365 Views
But its always just been an excuse to make a fire on the top of a hill. Stephen - 01/11/2011 05:32:57 PM 354 Views
Yup. I know there are various pagan origins, but honestly, fuck'em beetnemesis - 01/11/2011 08:17:12 PM 354 Views
I'm not going to do a history lesson, but... Isaac - 01/11/2011 09:22:59 PM 381 Views
What would you say is the proper plural form of Jesus? Nate - 01/11/2011 09:51:31 PM 386 Views
Claudii is an established plural, actually. Legolas - 01/11/2011 10:02:52 PM 458 Views
I want to reread Lamb: The story of Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal now beetnemesis - 01/11/2011 11:38:26 PM 465 Views
Jesī *NM* Praziquantel - 01/11/2011 10:06:29 PM 208 Views
Minor addendum: it seems to be a defective fourth declension. The plural should still be Iesūs. Tom - 01/11/2011 10:44:08 PM 350 Views
Ah, interesting. Praziquantel - 02/11/2011 10:22:37 AM 329 Views
The source? Any good Latin grammar should do. *NM* Tom - 02/11/2011 05:06:31 PM 144 Views
Also, a massive number of names follow 3rd declension. Tom - 02/11/2011 05:30:16 PM 285 Views
He is singular in nature Isaac - 01/11/2011 10:08:43 PM 381 Views
Ha. Nate - 01/11/2011 10:14:25 PM 304 Views
Re: Ha. Isaac - 02/11/2011 01:12:22 AM 377 Views
I thing attempting to discuss the plurality of Jesus precludes any serious discussion Stephen - 01/11/2011 10:41:01 PM 320 Views
Well, Zombie Jesus seems a legit matter for theological discussions Isaac - 02/11/2011 01:03:38 AM 301 Views
Lots of Mexican guys in one room could still be "Jesuses". *NM* Tom - 01/11/2011 10:47:03 PM 117 Views
So is it Jesūs, Jesii, or Jesuses then? Isaac - 02/11/2011 01:04:58 AM 300 Views
Well, in English I'd assume it's Jesuses. In Latin it would be Iesūs. Tom - 02/11/2011 01:06:09 AM 322 Views
As I mentioned above, the Latin plural would not be Jesi, but Jesūs. Tom - 01/11/2011 10:46:18 PM 305 Views
maybe his name is a plural anyway *NM* Yunalesca - 01/11/2011 11:13:03 PM 144 Views
Halloween isn't a Christian holiday, at least not originally. Tom - 01/11/2011 10:26:58 PM 371 Views
I was giving the abrigded version Isaac - 02/11/2011 01:01:07 AM 289 Views
Oh, well of course not. Tom - 02/11/2011 01:08:33 AM 317 Views
I know all of this, and care not. beetnemesis - 01/11/2011 11:37:12 PM 281 Views
Again halloween is a world thing, not US property Stephen - 02/11/2011 12:01:25 AM 314 Views
Not according to the Defense of Halloween Act of 1997! We own all IP rights and residuals. Tom - 02/11/2011 01:12:22 AM 328 Views
I honestly wasn't making it a US thing beetnemesis - 02/11/2011 02:43:59 PM 373 Views
Pagans and Satanists care a great deal about religion around Halloween. Tom - 02/11/2011 01:10:42 AM 325 Views
All Saints' Day is huge in New Orleans, as well. Lots of replastering and whitewashing cemeteries. *NM* Ghavrel - 02/11/2011 02:14:40 AM 129 Views
Thanks, Isaac ßelals Girl - 02/11/2011 03:08:14 AM 313 Views
Isaac - 02/11/2011 03:34:26 PM 287 Views
LMAO! That's great! *NM* ßelals Girl - 03/11/2011 01:24:09 PM 125 Views
Pet Peeve: Halloween isn't a holiday...its a celebration *NM* Jeordam - 01/11/2011 10:00:35 PM 143 Views
US Halloween is neither... Jacob - 01/11/2011 10:08:10 PM 349 Views
It seems internationally understood from what I can tell. Tom - 01/11/2011 10:48:02 PM 341 Views
Aren't morbid celebrations to ward away spirits pretty common throughout the world? *NM* Ghavrel - 01/11/2011 11:20:45 PM 143 Views
That's not what Halloween is in the US, though. Not anymore. *NM* beetnemesis - 01/11/2011 11:34:27 PM 128 Views
But Halloween isn't the property of you guys. Stephen - 02/11/2011 12:00:11 AM 309 Views
I honestly wasn't making it a US thing beetnemesis - 02/11/2011 02:50:08 PM 346 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes