Active Users:456 Time:12/05/2025 05:21:49 PM
Which changes what, exactly? - Edit 1

Before modification by Joel at 27/11/2011 12:26:37 PM

I am aware I have the most posts, by a fair margin, despite posting less than ever. I am also aware, as you surely are also, that would NOT be the highest total for virtually any two years in wotmanias history. I joined wotmania in summer of '04, lurked for six months and hit the 10k mark in mid-2007. Then I started working 12 hours a day and chasing a girl at another site, but still hit 20k a couple weeks before wotmania closed (though it required conscious effort.) Continuing at my current prolific rate would inaugurate RAFOs 10k club in about a year; Camilla, who has the second most posts, would join me about a year after THAT. That seems far more significant than my (nearly) 7000 posts (though I am pleased my 37+ views/post ratio is almost twice what it was on my best day at wotmania.)

I post less than ever. Until 2007 I was heavily active on three or more sites at any given time; now my activity is almost exclusively here. It looks like I post a lot here because so few others join me; when I posted more often at wotmania I never accounted for even 2% of the CMB, let alone 3% of the whole SITE (as is the case at RAFO.) While it is very flattering to suggest I almost singlehandedly altered RAFOs activity, we all know that is not the case. I can (and should) post on other RAFO MBs, and less generally, but since half of RAFOs posts are on the CMB, an inactive CMB indicates a problem much bigger than me, and thus one I cannot solve.

I genuinely regret being the sites most active member, but remain unconvinced decreasing my activity will increase the sites.

Return to message