Log-odds is generally for modelling reality instead of hypothetical systems, then?
It's going to be useful in any system where you're trying to reason with limited information (and hopefully doing Bayesian updating). That could include a hypothetical like the two barrels full of marbles, when we're trying to figure out which barrel we have by withdrawing only a small sample of marbles. Obviously, in the simpler example with one barrel and absolutely known numbers of each type of marble, log-odds of withdrawing a red marble will go to infinity if we happen to withdraw all the green marbles first.
Scooby Doo and Secular Humanism.
02/12/2011 09:58:49 PM
- 710 Views
Paraphrasing G.K. Chestertons famous affirmation of Christianity to justify secular humanism, eh?
02/12/2011 11:02:54 PM
- 432 Views
Love has nothing to do with spirituality or the supernatural; there is no universal meaning of life.
03/12/2011 04:33:13 AM
- 502 Views
Those are legitimate beliefs, but not proven facts.
03/12/2011 10:05:44 PM
- 510 Views
Quite a combination of impossible standards, artificial categories, and misunderstandings of science
04/12/2011 02:53:44 AM
- 514 Views
I have a question about log-odds formulation.
04/12/2011 06:36:02 AM
- 302 Views
It depends on if that's a realistic example or a toy example.
04/12/2011 05:32:34 PM
- 345 Views
That's pretty much what I thought. I meant in a toy example.
04/12/2011 10:17:47 PM
- 295 Views
That's how I would use it, anyway.
04/12/2011 10:41:01 PM
- 301 Views
Scooby Doo is not about secular fucking humanism. It's a Gnostic allegory.
02/12/2011 11:57:37 PM
- 392 Views
I had all but forgotten that post, one of the first I read at wotmania.
03/12/2011 10:09:36 PM
- 325 Views
Comparing me to Santa selling crack has positively made my day. Thank you!
05/12/2011 01:50:54 AM
- 442 Views
