Active Users:348 Time:16/05/2024 09:32:35 AM
The Pats may not even do as well as last time. - Edit 1

Before modification by Joel at 23/01/2012 05:34:24 AM

WORST. MATCHUP. EVER.

now we're going to spend the next two weeks talking about "the rematch" which the patriots are going to win because they were not allowed to win the last one. :rolleyes: of all the possible boring matchups, this is the worst possible outcome for the super bowl and i will probably not watch it this year...

They actually had a defence then. The Giants peaked at the right time, just as they did then, and were the only team in the Conference Championships that knows how to play well on BOTH sides of the ball. Yes, it is a rematch, and I would have preferred Elway remain the only QB to start 5 Super Bowls, but the Giants were the only remaining team I actually like a bit instead of heartily despising, so I am glad they are still alive, and like their chances against the Leagues 31st defence (only one defence is worse, and if the two of them had met in the Super Bowl NFL rules would need an overhaul even more desperately than they already do.)

If that "allowed" comment was an insinuation that the games are staged, all I can say is that if that were true the Denver Tebows would have played the Texans and their third string rookie QB in the AFC Championship, with the winner facing San Francisco as the OTHER Cinderella team of the year. Speaking of Tebow, if God cares anything at all about football (which, from where I sit, is dubious,) He will not let an arrogant, abusive cheat like McDumbass "win" another Super Bowl Ring after leading two different teams to next to last place in as many years. Gotta love that; you can be on a coaching staff that takes a team to 31st out of 32 and STILL finish the season in the Super Bowl. :rolleyes:

But how is a rematch of perhaps the greatest Super Bowl ever a disappointment? Because the Patriots are not nearly as good this time?

Return to message