Active Users:329 Time:06/07/2025 02:32:58 AM
Roland pretty much covered it. Joel Send a noteboard - 09/02/2012 11:35:06 PM
And if I have to shave twice between the beginning and ending of your reply, I'm really going to regret asking you.

The only thing he did not specifically mention is that, while many people support gay marriage, very few of them vote on that basis. So there are three groups:

1) Gays desperate for legal recognition of their right to marry.
2) Liberals, moderates and independents, who have no unanimous agreement on gay marriage, but few of whom use it to pick candidates.
3) Social conservatives enraged at the thought of two Obama appointees providing a 5-4 majority SCOTUS majority declaring gay marriage constitutional.

The second group is irrelevant; this issue is a non-factor in their choice for president, and the third group probably outnumbers the first by a fair margin. Worse, they would want revenge on Obama and to "reverse the damage," while gays have little to lose if Obama is defeated AFTER their constitutional right to marry is recognized. The only way their right to marry could realistically be threatened then would be an amendment to the US Constitution, to which the president is irrelevant.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Same Sex Marriage legal in California again, 9th Circuit Court of Appeals overturns prop 8 - 07/02/2012 08:21:12 PM 920 Views
Another good, important step. - 07/02/2012 09:08:10 PM 337 Views
Question: - 07/02/2012 11:18:35 PM 653 Views
Correct in most legal ways the court could split (but not all) - 07/02/2012 11:31:22 PM 414 Views
Good, sounds like some judges at least are human. *NM* - 08/02/2012 02:13:30 AM 148 Views
I disagree with this ruling. *NM* - 08/02/2012 03:49:47 AM 165 Views
Well I disagree with my tax dollars being used on the purchasing of Tanks *NM* - 08/02/2012 03:59:06 AM 166 Views
Okay. *NM* - 08/02/2012 05:33:19 AM 167 Views
Okay. *NM* - 08/02/2012 06:22:00 AM 152 Views
SCOTUS will overturn this ruling and uphold the ban,,,,, - 09/02/2012 01:16:00 AM 371 Views
Very unlikely. The most likely outcome is a 5-4 decision upholding the 9th Circuit. *NM* - 09/02/2012 01:24:08 AM 158 Views
Sure looks like it; good news for gays, bad news for Obama. - 09/02/2012 02:23:24 AM 507 Views
The only way that I think the votes would change is if a justice died or had to retire. - 09/02/2012 06:56:40 PM 474 Views
Interesting. - 09/02/2012 11:12:59 PM 421 Views
You lost me at bad news for Obama. How is such a ruling going to hurt him? - 09/02/2012 08:45:28 PM 351 Views
Turn out - 09/02/2012 10:53:07 PM 562 Views
Roland pretty much covered it. - 09/02/2012 11:35:06 PM 465 Views
Is Wayne Brady gonna have to vote a bitch into office? *NM* - 10/02/2012 01:21:40 AM 149 Views
No, someone already did that. - 10/02/2012 01:53:23 AM 465 Views
5-4 decision overturning the 9th Circuit - no doubt..... *NM* - 09/02/2012 03:09:17 AM 155 Views
You think Kennedy is going to vote to overturn? *NM* - 09/02/2012 03:53:49 AM 139 Views
Yes, this case has nothing to do with gay marriage..... - 09/02/2012 04:05:03 AM 459 Views
You really don't know what you are talking about - 09/02/2012 04:18:35 AM 528 Views
Nice try, but no dice. SCOTUS will rule that it doesn't violate the 14th amendment. *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:21:30 AM 165 Views
Do you hear what you are saying? - 09/02/2012 04:27:15 AM 455 Views
Congrats; sucks for Obama and Congressional Dems though. - 09/02/2012 02:38:22 AM 405 Views
This decision will not appear before Nov 2012 - 09/02/2012 03:47:58 AM 500 Views
OK then. - 09/02/2012 04:30:21 AM 318 Views

Reply to Message