But I don't think they should be allowed to vote while imprisoned, definitely. If you violate the social contract between you, your society, and the government, you certainly don't get to keep it anyway! Considering some of the ridiculous crimes that can be considered felonies, though, as well as the fact that I have some faith in the redemption of individuals, I think that PERMANENTLY is too far.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
No voter fraud Mr. Holder? I beg to differ.....
- 09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
824 Views
- 09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM
824 Views
The irony of a Republican-leaning person pointing this out... 
*NM*
- 09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
210 Views
*NM*
- 09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM
210 Views
Why is it ironic?
- 09/04/2012 09:54:10 PM
563 Views
The irony is merely that of the pot and the kettle
- 10/04/2012 01:05:39 AM
454 Views
If you are referring to FL in 2000.....those machines were bought by Dems.....
- 10/04/2012 01:17:26 AM
435 Views
Was thinking more about Ohio to be honest
- 10/04/2012 01:22:55 AM
444 Views
Intentional Voting Suppression is what they are trying to do in Florida right now(due to a 2011 law)
- 10/04/2012 04:22:25 AM
614 Views
Honestly, I'm fine with convicted felons permanently losing their right to vote.....
- 10/04/2012 04:34:31 AM
424 Views
I am also fine with stupid people not being allowed to vote
- 10/04/2012 04:36:20 AM
394 Views
Agreed - stupid people should not be allowed to vote, maybe an IQ test?
- 10/04/2012 05:17:43 AM
392 Views
I don't know about permanently...
- 10/04/2012 02:10:10 PM
420 Views
Who is talking about letting felons vote in prison?
- 10/04/2012 02:24:29 PM
501 Views
The League of Women Voters, for one
- 10/04/2012 08:50:39 PM
415 Views
Well, that is simply ridiculous then, and merits no consideration.
- 10/04/2012 11:53:04 PM
530 Views
To play Devil's Advocate, there's some legitimacy to the concept
- 11/04/2012 04:24:37 AM
484 Views
Sounds like people deliberately missing the point more than anything.
- 11/04/2012 07:45:40 AM
508 Views
Ohio? When? *NM*
- 10/04/2012 04:30:29 AM
163 Views
2008.
- 10/04/2012 04:37:15 AM
397 Views
Once again, Dems were running those polls and counties.
- 10/04/2012 05:19:14 AM
377 Views
they were not in 2004 and still had vote supression and irregularities
- 10/04/2012 04:44:36 PM
404 Views
I think you've got your facts wrong
- 10/04/2012 09:00:55 PM
413 Views
well, to be fair, it *has* been 8 years 
- 11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
482 Views
- 11/04/2012 03:49:17 AM
482 Views
Fair Enough, my 'memory' is mostly google based on this anyway, from about a year ago and now
- 11/04/2012 04:00:57 AM
473 Views
Stating something doesn't make it true
- 10/04/2012 04:10:33 AM
440 Views
I'm impressed that you wrote so much in reply
- 10/04/2012 04:36:02 AM
408 Views
Then demonstrate that by having the courtesy to rebut it or withdraw your remarks
- 10/04/2012 06:30:52 AM
474 Views
How long voting takes is a function of machines, not voters.
- 10/04/2012 02:08:39 PM
484 Views
It's a function of various factors, that can certainly be one
- 10/04/2012 08:12:08 PM
444 Views
Ohio in 2004 was hinky enough to prompt the only Congressional challenge since 1876s Corrupt Bargain
- 10/04/2012 11:36:52 PM
582 Views
The fact that it's possible doesn't mean it's widespread, nor that every countermeasure is justified *NM*
- 10/04/2012 11:57:16 AM
175 Views
As long as people need not purchase their voting requirements, voter IDs are fine by me.
- 10/04/2012 12:53:35 PM
498 Views