Active Users:644 Time:04/08/2025 06:15:32 AM
It isn't brain science... wiat a minute, it actually is... everynametaken Send a noteboard - 27/09/2009 01:18:35 AM
It works between 2 and 6 the best because kids in that age range do not have the cognitive capability to comprehend the ramifications of their behavior the way older children do. In that age range children learn primarily by associations like positive and negative reinforcement and aversion so a spanking WITH an explanation for the punishment as quickly as possible after the behavior to be curbed is VERY effective. The main problem is that parents don't apply the punishment immediately and they don't explain to their kids why they are being punished AND they add on all the verbal bullshit which the kids end up figuring out means they are a piece of shit who deserves violent responses for their actions.

Not lecturing you btw, I know you get it, just explaining the mechanism for anyone else who reads this.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Apparently spanking makes children stupid. - 26/09/2009 12:25:34 PM 1140 Views
Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:34:41 PM 672 Views
Re: Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:36:24 PM 726 Views
Negative memories aren't all bad. Parents just need to be consistent, yet loving. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:06:07 PM 327 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:41:39 PM 318 Views
I dunno.. - 26/09/2009 02:49:50 PM 676 Views
I do believe this study was created to prove the point, not test it. - 26/09/2009 03:25:54 PM 696 Views
What are your grounds for that belief? - 26/09/2009 04:11:37 PM 700 Views
Duke University is one of the best universities in the United States - 26/09/2009 05:11:21 PM 681 Views
Yeah, I have heard of it. - 26/09/2009 05:56:30 PM 651 Views
I agree with her, and here's why - 26/09/2009 06:28:53 PM 656 Views
You are apparently pretty ignorant about psychology if you think it is pseudo-science. - 27/09/2009 01:09:02 AM 643 Views
Bah. It's not falsifiable. - 27/09/2009 01:09:37 PM 745 Views
Karl Popper had a turquoise willy. Falsify THAT with your CERNomatic juiceharp, Galileo. *NM* - 27/09/2009 03:05:44 PM 308 Views
hehe. *NM* - 27/09/2009 04:24:54 PM 318 Views
I would agree... and... - 27/09/2009 01:45:48 AM 614 Views
More likely their comparing two effects and claiming correlation - 27/09/2009 02:32:42 PM 623 Views
Clearly that's why all of our old people are so stupid. - 26/09/2009 04:09:52 PM 664 Views
No, no, that's just nossy bringing down the average. *NM* - 26/09/2009 04:12:10 PM 322 Views
That's not what the study says. It says don't spank VERY young children - 26/09/2009 05:16:33 PM 774 Views
Hahaha *NM* - 26/09/2009 05:58:01 PM 345 Views
Did I miss something or did I just forget? - 27/09/2009 12:54:13 AM 688 Views
Uh... - 27/09/2009 03:32:03 PM 652 Views
She's a beauty! - 28/09/2009 05:16:36 AM 651 Views
too cute for words! *NM* - 28/09/2009 01:33:29 PM 350 Views
That is also what I got. *NM* - 27/09/2009 12:56:08 AM 317 Views
It isn't brain science... wiat a minute, it actually is... - 27/09/2009 01:18:35 AM 654 Views
Agreed. - 28/09/2009 12:06:29 AM 714 Views
For children that young, I can agree. - 26/09/2009 05:56:41 PM 657 Views
With this too, I agree. ^_^ *NM* - 27/09/2009 01:46:32 AM 289 Views
*rings in* Same. - 04/10/2009 11:55:02 PM 828 Views
Really? - 27/09/2009 01:48:35 AM 707 Views
I must be pretty stupid, then. - 28/09/2009 05:49:26 PM 645 Views
It certainly can make them kinky. *NM* - 28/09/2009 07:19:34 PM 334 Views
It's the old "nature v. nurture" argument again... *NM* - 05/10/2009 06:08:26 PM 256 Views
When the kid has both, it's really screwed over then. *NM* - 05/10/2009 07:48:15 PM 268 Views

Reply to Message