And while I don't have a scientific sampling, or anything, I am pretty sure that there are far more instances of the "wrong" use than the right one. Eventually, it becomes right by committee.
Eschew Verbosity
An article on grammar that makes me want to start a slow movie clap.
- 26/04/2012 12:26:21 AM
845 Views
I almost completely agree with them.
- 26/04/2012 02:38:06 AM
565 Views
Misusing "Literally" is one of the few grammar issues that actually bothers me.
- 26/04/2012 05:18:21 AM
490 Views
I'm with you on all points. Furthermore, misuse of "literally" isn't a grammar issue at all.
- 26/04/2012 07:07:11 PM
478 Views
I never did get that fuss about "literally".
- 26/04/2012 08:12:14 PM
544 Views
Your example is slightly different from e.g. "My blood was literally boiling". *NM*
- 27/04/2012 02:13:05 PM
209 Views
I used the article's example. But I don't see why your example is any different in that regard. *NM*
- 27/04/2012 07:03:03 PM
182 Views
Yeah, literally in hyperbole doesn't bother me. But I also don't mind when people mock its usage. *NM*
- 27/04/2012 08:21:05 PM
190 Views
You clearly need to watch more English football coverage, Sky in particular.
- 28/04/2012 02:01:11 PM
525 Views
It's all about usage.
- 27/04/2012 04:13:52 PM
439 Views
They provide the wrong rationale for good/well
- 26/04/2012 02:55:10 AM
582 Views
Hopefully you be right... hm, I don't know about that one. 
- 26/04/2012 08:22:05 PM
437 Views
- 26/04/2012 08:22:05 PM
437 Views
Sometimes, I do actually use that construction when speaking to others near me
- 26/04/2012 09:10:02 PM
442 Views
If I'm not mistaken, the Future Indicative evolved from and replaced some of the Subjunctive.
- 27/04/2012 09:44:33 PM
593 Views
There was never an optative in recorded Latin or later Romance languages.
- 27/04/2012 09:58:11 PM
440 Views
It's not Ojala which makes me think there's a connection between the Conditional and Optative
- 28/04/2012 04:28:35 AM
516 Views