I have a question, though, about Hawking Radiation. Given that the pairs pop up randomly at the event horizon, is the decay essentially a result of the gambler's dilemma-i.e. given infinite time, the gambler always loses because he can't bet when his funds drop below zero?
Correct me if I have this wrong, but from what I gather it would go like this.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Negative falls in, positive goes away. Black hole loses mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Positive falls in, negative goes away. Black hole gains mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Positive falls in, negative goes away. Black hole gains mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Positive falls in, negative goes away. Black hole gains mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Negative falls in, positive goes away. Black hole loses mass.
And so forth. The idea being that it's random, but eventually the black hole has its mass reduced to zero. Is this right, or is it the case that only the negative particles enter the singularity? And if so, can you explain why to me without having to resort to math that will go way over my head?
Thanks!
Correct me if I have this wrong, but from what I gather it would go like this.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Negative falls in, positive goes away. Black hole loses mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Positive falls in, negative goes away. Black hole gains mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Positive falls in, negative goes away. Black hole gains mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Positive falls in, negative goes away. Black hole gains mass.
Particle pair pops up at event horizon. Negative falls in, positive goes away. Black hole loses mass.
And so forth. The idea being that it's random, but eventually the black hole has its mass reduced to zero. Is this right, or is it the case that only the negative particles enter the singularity? And if so, can you explain why to me without having to resort to math that will go way over my head?
Thanks!

"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
~Camilla
Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel
*MySmiley*
Elvis Back from Space; Reveals It Is Giant Black Hole Cannon Randomly Firing at Irregular Intervals
08/06/2012 01:48:40 AM
- 733 Views
I think you're drawing some bad conclusions off this
08/06/2012 04:57:03 AM
- 467 Views
A real possibility.
09/06/2012 01:30:49 AM
- 406 Views
Re: A real possibility.
09/06/2012 06:33:54 PM
- 530 Views
<3
10/06/2012 12:46:36 AM
- 405 Views
I'm afraid not, you're assuming particles with negative mass, those may exist but aren't involved
10/06/2012 01:48:30 AM
- 375 Views
I genuinely forgot your antipathy to the Disney film, sorry.
11/06/2012 04:36:42 AM
- 435 Views
I trimmed some, I need to know what you just said to reply to it.
11/06/2012 08:20:35 AM
- 549 Views
Re: I think you're drawing some bad conclusions off this
09/06/2012 04:43:50 PM
- 385 Views
Chewt abides.
30/06/2012 08:59:14 PM
- 415 Views
Hey, necroing old threads is Very Very WRONG!
30/06/2012 09:37:12 PM
- 361 Views
