I'm sure there are enough people here who can help me with the following sentence:
"In addition, we did not take structural uncertainty into account, which might very well eclipse any parameter uncertainty."
I was rather proud of it myself for this sentence (as to me it says exactly what it needs to say, in less than the five sentences that a colleague of mine needed), but my boss just asked me what "eclipse" means, and that basically means I should rewrite it or she won't accept it "as real English". It's part of a scientific paper, and as such it might not by "too science"-y, but I was under the impression that it was correct English.
So, any synonyms I can (should) use?
"In addition, we did not take structural uncertainty into account, which might very well eclipse any parameter uncertainty."
I was rather proud of it myself for this sentence (as to me it says exactly what it needs to say, in less than the five sentences that a colleague of mine needed), but my boss just asked me what "eclipse" means, and that basically means I should rewrite it or she won't accept it "as real English". It's part of a scientific paper, and as such it might not by "too science"-y, but I was under the impression that it was correct English.
So, any synonyms I can (should) use?
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Synonym wanted
12/06/2012 08:46:37 AM
- 692 Views
Outweigh, counterbalance, overwhelm, invalidate, nullify, make insignificant
12/06/2012 03:25:16 PM
- 462 Views
My impression is she understood it, but questions the legitimacy of its general definition.
12/06/2012 08:11:58 PM
- 378 Views
Perhaps "dwarf" or "surpass," but "eclipse" is a perfectly cromulent word.
12/06/2012 07:51:26 PM
- 514 Views

Agreed, they embiggen the vocabulary *NM*
13/06/2012 01:16:41 PM
- 189 Views
I am curious now how this ended.
29/06/2012 04:02:08 AM
- 439 Views
"Mask"? Not sure I know what you mean by "eclipse", but this is how I interpret it. *NM*
13/06/2012 12:44:18 PM
- 162 Views
Eclipse might be a bad choice, I'd really want the context around it, but...
13/06/2012 01:33:37 PM
- 366 Views