Active Users:119 Time:22/07/2025 03:13:07 PM
Synonym wanted Artsapat Send a noteboard - 12/06/2012 08:46:37 AM
I'm sure there are enough people here who can help me with the following sentence:

"In addition, we did not take structural uncertainty into account, which might very well eclipse any parameter uncertainty."

I was rather proud of it myself for this sentence (as to me it says exactly what it needs to say, in less than the five sentences that a colleague of mine needed), but my boss just asked me what "eclipse" means, and that basically means I should rewrite it or she won't accept it "as real English". It's part of a scientific paper, and as such it might not by "too science"-y, but I was under the impression that it was correct English.

So, any synonyms I can (should) use?
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Synonym wanted - 12/06/2012 08:46:37 AM 692 Views
Outstrip? *NM* - 12/06/2012 10:51:24 AM 263 Views
exceed. And simplify "might very well" into "may" *NM* - 12/06/2012 01:52:23 PM 171 Views
Outweigh, counterbalance, overwhelm, invalidate, nullify, make insignificant - 12/06/2012 03:25:16 PM 462 Views
This. *NM* - 12/06/2012 04:38:55 PM 172 Views
Not stupid, just no native speaker. - 12/06/2012 07:29:43 PM 390 Views
And speaks what...Hungarian? - 13/06/2012 07:07:33 AM 442 Views
My impression is she understood it, but questions the legitimacy of its general definition. - 12/06/2012 08:11:58 PM 378 Views
No, that's still ignorance. - 12/06/2012 08:51:50 PM 358 Views
Perhaps, technically, it is ignorance AS inexperience. - 12/06/2012 10:08:46 PM 392 Views
Perhaps "dwarf" or "surpass," but "eclipse" is a perfectly cromulent word. - 12/06/2012 07:51:26 PM 514 Views
Agreed, they embiggen the vocabulary *NM* - 13/06/2012 01:16:41 PM 189 Views
I am curious now how this ended. - 29/06/2012 04:02:08 AM 439 Views
You could just ask Pepijn directly instead of me ya know - 29/06/2012 10:55:30 AM 341 Views
Good plan. - 29/06/2012 10:59:30 AM 361 Views
"Bosh." - 30/06/2012 10:12:20 PM 426 Views

Reply to Message