when you cruise to a 78 point halftime lead, you are no longer competing against anyone but yourself. it's obvious nigeria didn't have the kind of training and dedication to field a team that could compete at the nba level, but they aren't such pushovers that they can't compete against the rest of the world.
If they'd had a 78 point halftime lead, only winning in the end by an 83 point halftime lead *would* have meant that they intentionally lowered their level big time in the second half. Of course, that just wasn't the case because their halftime lead was 33 points. And they did give all players on their team ample minutes instead of focusing on the stars - but then, the team does have rather few players who aren't stars.
/olympics: is it necessary to win a basketball game by 80+ points?
- 03/08/2012 08:39:56 AM
718 Views
Judging by what happened in the badminton, yes it is.
- 03/08/2012 08:45:23 AM
489 Views
yes i know they had to actually play the game to the end, i still find it boring to watch either way
- 03/08/2012 04:06:14 PM
429 Views
Maybe the IOC shouldn't let Nigeria compete if they can't keep up with real countries.
- 03/08/2012 12:12:24 PM
665 Views
My thoughts are they could institutionalise something like the soccer competition
- 03/08/2012 12:51:09 PM
419 Views
Soccer does that on purpose so that the World Cup means a lot more *NM*
- 03/08/2012 03:22:35 PM
202 Views
Football does it *because* the Euro/World Cups mean a lot more. An important distinction. *NM*
- 03/08/2012 07:58:58 PM
196 Views
What Wibble said, and the reason has to do with the amount of competitive teams.
- 03/08/2012 08:25:08 PM
487 Views
Re: Maybe the IOC shouldn't let Nigeria compete if they can't keep up with real countries.
- 03/08/2012 04:28:53 PM
650 Views
Where do you get "78 point halftime lead"?
- 03/08/2012 07:32:13 PM
425 Views
So who is stopping the other countries from making their own NBAs if they want to compete?
- 03/08/2012 08:56:46 PM
454 Views
Did you read coach K's response?
- 03/08/2012 03:50:26 PM
507 Views
i saw it this morning after i had already posted the original comment
- 03/08/2012 04:32:08 PM
567 Views
I guess I still don't understand your complaint.
- 03/08/2012 06:17:05 PM
487 Views
my main objection is how the olympics are now nothing more than an extension of pro leagues
- 04/08/2012 05:39:08 PM
419 Views
You'd have us kick out every Olympian other than the boxers, then?
- 04/08/2012 06:00:08 PM
410 Views
no, i'd have the olympics be more about sport and less about money
- 04/08/2012 06:12:24 PM
428 Views
"Need"
- 03/08/2012 06:17:26 PM
433 Views
Re: "Need"
- 04/08/2012 05:53:39 PM
455 Views
No. Do you want to know, really? Your tone throughout makes me wonder if you do. *NM*
- 05/08/2012 05:09:42 PM
194 Views
The US doesn't always win the gold medal, you know.
- 03/08/2012 07:41:33 PM
534 Views
one silver, two bronze, one boycott -- all others gold since 1936
- 04/08/2012 05:55:11 PM
436 Views
I prefer athletes to put in their best performances, since their wages are paid for by spectators
- 03/08/2012 07:04:33 PM
462 Views
You really don't seem to grasp athletic competitions too well, it seems
- 03/08/2012 09:31:53 PM
562 Views
The "professionals shouldn't compete" argument is one of the dumbest things I've read in months.
- 06/08/2012 07:08:56 AM
421 Views