Active Users:716 Time:28/12/2025 08:19:19 PM
Roethlisberger's stats in that first Super Bowl... *shudders* Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 10/09/2012 08:34:35 PM
Their Ds actually rode THEM to Super Bowls. Roethlisberger, well, trailing us by three in the fourth quarter last night he had Mike Wallace uncovered deep, but through a short incompletion, and Denver finally stopped Pitt on third down, something we had not done since the first quarter. After a subsequent Denver FG extended our lead to 6 points, Roethlisberger stared straight at Tracy Porter for at least 2-3 seconds before throwing a ball straight to him that the Denver corner returned all the way for a TD that iced the game at the two minute warning.

Roethlisberger actually does kind of suck; he is Tebow without the excuse of being a second year player. Brees and Rodgers have proven themselves.


He got drafted into the perfect team. I always wondered if a player's career is made or broken by the team that drafts him. Does Cleavland really have that much bad luck or do they ruin their QBs with a sorry supporting cast? Would David Carr had suceeded elsewhere if not for being drafted by an expanison team? How good, exactly, would Roethlisberger be on another team?
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Super Bowl champs Brees, Rodgers, and Roethlisberger suck and should be benched - 10/09/2012 04:31:53 PM 443 Views
But Vick is great because his team won even if he have 2 fumbles and 4 picks - 10/09/2012 04:49:00 PM 347 Views
Yep! Vick is CLUTCH and therefore the best QB in the league - 10/09/2012 04:53:43 PM 377 Views
Vick is the greatest athlete to play the game of sport, ever *NM* - 10/09/2012 11:05:36 PM 131 Views
To bad that doesn't result in him being a great QB *NM* - 11/09/2012 02:28:41 AM 157 Views
*cue: Joel* *NM* - 10/09/2012 05:30:28 PM 233 Views
We have to look on the bright side. - 10/09/2012 06:04:21 PM 382 Views
Very true. *NM* - 10/09/2012 07:37:57 PM 138 Views
yes it is way more important than that *NM* - 10/09/2012 07:44:22 PM 173 Views
You're ignoring the far more important statistics: - 10/09/2012 06:20:48 PM 403 Views
Heh, did not see this when responding to you, but Brees and Rodgers did not ride Ds to Super Bowls. - 10/09/2012 08:06:09 PM 475 Views
Roethlisberger's stats in that first Super Bowl... *shudders* - 10/09/2012 08:34:35 PM 366 Views
Indeed. - 10/09/2012 11:15:23 PM 461 Views
Total touchdowns scored by Tony Romo in Super Bowls: zero. - 11/09/2012 12:22:01 AM 375 Views
Celebrity girlfriend? Dude get with the times - 11/09/2012 12:52:04 AM 441 Views
Re: Celebrity girlfriend? Dude get with the times - 12/09/2012 08:23:54 AM 378 Views
Offense has rarely been an issue in Dallas - 12/09/2012 04:22:19 PM 479 Views
you should stick with that argument because it is the only one the works - 11/09/2012 02:59:52 AM 347 Views
The one point I made about Romo WAS team oriented, you moron. My post was about image. - 12/09/2012 08:07:51 AM 491 Views
no dipshit that it wasn't *NM* - 12/09/2012 12:46:18 PM 143 Views
You ignore important facts - 12/09/2012 04:34:50 PM 456 Views

Reply to Message