Active Users:337 Time:02/07/2025 04:27:12 AM
I think he has a good point. It just shouldn't be generalized so far as he is doing. - Edit 1

Before modification by Burr at 16/10/2012 09:27:44 PM

It would be dishonest not to admit that sometimes we get tired of being on the defensive and attack back with more verbal cruelty than is necessary. But I don't think it is generally characteristic of the gay rights movement, nor of the terms Narg has picked out.

And it certainly isn't a valid defense of being against gay marriage anymore than calling someone a bigot (however accurately the term might be applied) is a valid defense of being for gay marriage.

Return to message