I think he has a good point.  It just shouldn't be generalized so far as he is doing. - Edit 1
		
	Before modification by Burr at 16/10/2012 09:27:44 PM
		
			
				It would be dishonest not to admit that sometimes we get tired of being on the defensive and attack back with more verbal cruelty than is necessary.  But I don't think it is generally characteristic of the gay rights movement, nor of the terms Narg has picked out.
And it certainly isn't a valid defense of being against gay marriage anymore than calling someone a bigot (however accurately the term might be applied) is a valid defense of being for gay marriage.
	
	And it certainly isn't a valid defense of being against gay marriage anymore than calling someone a bigot (however accurately the term might be applied) is a valid defense of being for gay marriage.

 
  
  
  
  
 