that's hilarious and evokes a "what the shit?" much like all those gop jackasses.
temeraire Send a noteboard - 25/10/2012 08:03:24 PM
i can't understand how mitt can say he wants to help the women under sharia law when he endorses folks who are going to put women here under a christian version of it. if there's no legal abortion and rape is god-given, what really separates us from them? soon men will insist that women have to dress differently to "avoid rape" and then these men in charge insist we take men with us everywhere to protect ourselves. how the hell can anyone in their right minds vote for these fundamentalist jackasses? if you know a woman or an lgbt person, how can you even think about it? how???
"it's like the real world, except there's dragons!"
cw, you are missed...
cw, you are missed...
every time a republican candidate mentions rape, i think of the following video
- 25/10/2012 05:58:16 PM
910 Views
that's hilarious and evokes a "what the shit?" much like all those gop jackasses.
- 25/10/2012 08:03:24 PM
607 Views
The sole difference between Western and Mideast fundamentalists is the god blamed for intolerance
- 26/10/2012 01:29:54 AM
572 Views
I am SO GOING to get flamed for asking this
- 25/10/2012 08:45:21 PM
591 Views
- 25/10/2012 08:45:21 PM
591 Views
No, because God did not have sex with Mary.
- 25/10/2012 09:23:12 PM
704 Views
Closer than Roland, but still off.
- 25/10/2012 09:51:12 PM
589 Views
However parsed, since Marys supposed sinlessness is through Christs conception, it is retroactive
- 25/10/2012 10:10:48 PM
574 Views
The point I am horrible job making is this
- 25/10/2012 10:12:53 PM
586 Views
The biblical narrative states an act of CONCEPTION without an act of SEX.
- 25/10/2012 10:37:48 PM
556 Views
New GOP Congressmen daily refute the GOPs pretended support of rape exceptions to abortion bans.
- 25/10/2012 10:07:21 PM
837 Views
This is not a source I generally resort to, but let me quote John Cornyn:
- 25/10/2012 11:11:04 PM
570 Views
I think he is an idiot for saying it
- 25/10/2012 11:53:01 PM
582 Views
Calling y Gods will calls x Gods will, because y depends on x.
- 26/10/2012 12:14:27 AM
700 Views
I'm really not going to debate theodicy with you, especially since I'm not even a believer.
- 26/10/2012 12:24:57 AM
567 Views
Choice forms a critical distinction there; small wonder Cornyn and Mourdock missed it.
- 26/10/2012 12:48:18 AM
645 Views


