Unlike cigarette taxes, where there is no benefit whatsoever from smoking and harm from even small amounts of cigarette smoke, sugar is, quite simply, energy for the body and, if taken in the right amounts, helpful to the body's proper functioning. A tax on fats is even more ridiculous, as the notion that "eating fat makes you fat" has been so thoroughly disproven as to be laughable. Fats, proteins and carbohydrates (i.e., sugars) are all needed for our bodies to properly function.
If these substances are abused by some, that is their own problem. Of course, this is one reason why I have issues with the entire socialized medicine concept, because it gives the government reason to stick its nose into people's eating habits. That aside, however, the solution would seem to me to be a surtax on the obese.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Sin taxes on fat and sugar. What do you think?
- 13/11/2012 09:19:33 AM
778 Views
Sure. Revenue's got to come from somewhere. But only after we end corn subsidies and the like. *NM*
- 13/11/2012 01:52:01 PM
280 Views
I think they are stupid ideas.
- 13/11/2012 02:11:14 PM
578 Views
Re: I think they are stupid ideas.
- 13/11/2012 03:28:59 PM
568 Views
Yeah you're right
- 13/11/2012 03:52:09 PM
541 Views
Yes, that is exactly what I meant
- 13/11/2012 03:59:00 PM
569 Views
I would recommend you read Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes
- 14/11/2012 06:04:42 AM
634 Views
Agreed 100% *NM*
- 13/11/2012 03:52:38 PM
243 Views
Palm oil? They want to tax shampoo?
- 13/11/2012 11:03:44 PM
516 Views
No, the tax is only for foodstuffs in which palm oil is an ingredient. I should've clarified that *NM*
- 14/11/2012 11:53:30 AM
247 Views
A palm oil tax is potentially a much more complex issue than you suggest
- 13/11/2012 11:12:24 PM
511 Views
Re: A palm oil tax is potentially a much more complex issue than you suggest
- 14/11/2012 05:25:15 PM
560 Views
