Unlike cigarette taxes, where there is no benefit whatsoever from smoking and harm from even small amounts of cigarette smoke, sugar is, quite simply, energy for the body and, if taken in the right amounts, helpful to the body's proper functioning. A tax on fats is even more ridiculous, as the notion that "eating fat makes you fat" has been so thoroughly disproven as to be laughable. Fats, proteins and carbohydrates (i.e., sugars) are all needed for our bodies to properly function.
If these substances are abused by some, that is their own problem. Of course, this is one reason why I have issues with the entire socialized medicine concept, because it gives the government reason to stick its nose into people's eating habits. That aside, however, the solution would seem to me to be a surtax on the obese.
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Sin taxes on fat and sugar. What do you think?
13/11/2012 09:19:33 AM
- 611 Views
Sure. Revenue's got to come from somewhere. But only after we end corn subsidies and the like. *NM*
13/11/2012 01:52:01 PM
- 202 Views
I think they are stupid ideas.
13/11/2012 02:11:14 PM
- 394 Views
Re: I think they are stupid ideas.
13/11/2012 03:28:59 PM
- 381 Views
Yeah you're right
13/11/2012 03:52:09 PM
- 356 Views
Yes, that is exactly what I meant
13/11/2012 03:59:00 PM
- 382 Views
I would recommend you read Good Calories, Bad Calories by Gary Taubes
14/11/2012 06:04:42 AM
- 421 Views
Agreed 100% *NM*
13/11/2012 03:52:38 PM
- 159 Views
Palm oil? They want to tax shampoo?
13/11/2012 11:03:44 PM
- 332 Views
No, the tax is only for foodstuffs in which palm oil is an ingredient. I should've clarified that *NM*
14/11/2012 11:53:30 AM
- 183 Views
A palm oil tax is potentially a much more complex issue than you suggest
13/11/2012 11:12:24 PM
- 322 Views
Re: A palm oil tax is potentially a much more complex issue than you suggest
14/11/2012 05:25:15 PM
- 343 Views