It sounds like you misunderstood my reply to Ghavrel.
heartbreak Send a noteboard - 24/01/2013 10:41:20 PM
We haven't really discussed the topic of this post. You and I that is. Neither has Isaac and I for that matter but I am willing to discuss other things that pertain to the post and thus the replying.
Ghavrel pretty much hit the nail on the head.
Ghavrel pretty much hit the nail on the head.
You can't lie about the facts.
24/01/2013 04:37:17 AM
- 880 Views
You can, of course, misuse them to draw erroneous conclusions.
24/01/2013 07:49:13 AM
- 591 Views
This is pretty much the tongue in cheek point I was going for. *NM*
24/01/2013 12:51:47 PM
- 221 Views
But you can misunderstand them...
24/01/2013 12:39:08 PM
- 634 Views
All I got from this was...
24/01/2013 03:35:57 PM
- 570 Views
Methodology is different, I'll go over it, but I'm referencing the BLS U6 data
24/01/2013 06:32:49 PM
- 764 Views
Straight from the horse's mouth.
24/01/2013 06:47:00 PM
- 581 Views
Excellent, now look up Dec 2008
24/01/2013 07:06:13 PM
- 595 Views
Links are useful.
24/01/2013 08:10:25 PM
- 477 Views
Don't you think maybe...
24/01/2013 08:33:29 PM
- 494 Views
What exactly am I defending? *NM*
24/01/2013 10:16:36 PM
- 224 Views
You just repeated your original post, merely with the numbers corrected.
24/01/2013 10:31:54 PM
- 452 Views
It sounds like you misunderstood my reply to Ghavrel.
24/01/2013 10:41:20 PM
- 688 Views
Thanks to the internet, now everyone IS entitled to their own "facts."
26/01/2013 08:20:11 PM
- 457 Views