Active Users:575 Time:23/10/2026 05:04:35 PM
Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
Coal - One of the Cleanest Energy Sources in the World! - 20/02/2013 09:41:02 PM 1523 Views
This could mean great news for me personally - 20/02/2013 09:50:39 PM 1208 Views
I wonder if it could work on other fuels? - 20/02/2013 10:18:08 PM 1183 Views
Uh, not quite... - 21/02/2013 02:45:03 AM 1015 Views
Do we also need our oceans to be 30% more acidic? *NM* - 21/02/2013 03:40:19 AM 620 Views
There's a certain irony to being criticized on this one from that sector - 21/02/2013 05:37:37 PM 1298 Views
aplogies - 21/02/2013 09:58:46 PM 1089 Views
No problem *NM* - 21/02/2013 10:47:10 PM 520 Views
It seems pretty dubious. It still produces CO2. - 21/02/2013 10:02:55 AM 1030 Views
i can think of three uses for excess CO2 - 21/02/2013 03:16:42 PM 1124 Views
Every single one of those increases atmospheric carbon. - 22/02/2013 12:39:00 AM 1064 Views
The technology is still a big improvement over current methods. - 21/02/2013 05:01:31 PM 1087 Views
Oh, I agree. My point is just that sequestration will remain an issue. *NM* - 22/02/2013 12:39:25 AM 512 Views
Well dense CO2 is easier to get rid of - 21/02/2013 06:08:33 PM 1015 Views
Interesting. - 21/02/2013 09:57:27 AM 1060 Views
Probably too little, too late. - 21/02/2013 04:09:45 PM 1146 Views
The excessive regulation is on coal use, not production. - 21/02/2013 05:00:28 PM 1072 Views
Nope. - 25/02/2013 05:26:39 AM 1048 Views

Reply to Message