Active Users:1687 Time:07/04/2026 05:42:23 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You sound like Voldemort lol Nighthawk Send a noteboard - 26/02/2013 01:28:40 PM

As though aging and dying is a shameful thing. We must do anything and everything to avoid that fate, eh? In all seriousness, how long we can live is not the relevant question. The relevant question is, how long can we live well? I rather die at 80, with my full faculties, than die at 120, being fed and taken care of for 10+ miserable years.

Reply to message
Scientists claim 72 is the new 30 Isaac - 26/02/2013 03:06:04 AM 1007 Views
"New" is a relative term, as its usage here demonstrates. Joel - 26/02/2013 04:31:24 AM 503 Views
Re: "New" is a relative term, as its usage here demonstrates. Isaac - 26/02/2013 08:28:58 AM 436 Views
Perhaps quality of life is the basic moral issue here. Joel - 28/02/2013 08:16:48 PM 395 Views
I don't see why it would be immoral, but I can see why it would be undesirable A Deathwatch Guard - 26/02/2013 04:59:32 AM 451 Views
Stole my answer . . . Palatine - 26/02/2013 01:20:33 PM 377 Views
It comes down to the same thing A Deathwatch Guard - 26/02/2013 05:10:14 PM 408 Views
You sound like Voldemort lol Nighthawk - 26/02/2013 01:28:40 PM 478 Views
I haven't read Harry Potter so I'll take your word for it Isaac - 26/02/2013 03:13:55 PM 390 Views
Solution: Only live to 110. No miserable last 10 years. *NM* Bergioyn - 26/02/2013 08:18:41 PM 255 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes