Active Users:343 Time:03/05/2024 01:28:43 AM
You summed it up well. I now feel no need to respond to his idiocy. Thank you. *NM* everynametaken Send a noteboard - 20/11/2014 03:06:39 AM

View original post
I don't know enough about the situation in Ferguson to espouse a position on it (although that doesn't appear to have stopped you), but trying every single person who is so much as suspected of murder would grind our legal system to a halt. It would also, in federal cases, be a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment. The case in question is, I believe, a state case, but Missouri also uses a grand jury system. Whether that's a provision of the state constitution, as it is in my state, I don't know. In any event, casually dismissing one of the pillars of criminal law in the US is idiotic.

And the idea of putting on a jury trial for every single police officer who shoots a person is so incomprehensibly stupid that I am having trouble believing you actually stopped to think about that sentence for more than half a second.

This was just an embarrassing post to read, in all.


But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
these things should be simple: shoot someone dead -> face a jury trial to determine your guilt - 18/11/2014 11:38:11 PM 977 Views
That's a viewpoint completely divorced from reality. - 19/11/2014 07:03:07 AM 526 Views
You summed it up well. I now feel no need to respond to his idiocy. Thank you. *NM* - 20/11/2014 03:06:39 AM 314 Views
You are 100% correct - 19/11/2014 05:42:34 PM 534 Views
He is facing a jury - 22/11/2014 06:01:28 AM 547 Views

Reply to Message