Active Users:345 Time:06/07/2025 08:42:23 AM
No one said that, but arguing "most cops do nothing wrong so no cops do anything wrong" is false too Joel Send a noteboard - 09/08/2015 04:46:49 AM

Seriously, did you REALLY just say


View original postPeople are getting tired of this stupidity where outspoken racist hide behind crime in past to commit their present racial assault and they are really tired of the mind numbing stupidity of the whites who are to spineless to call them out for because they are scared of being called racist.

That reads like an Al Sharpton statement—except he defends dead people, not their slayers.It is even more jarring on the heels of THIS:


View original postIsn't that very similar to the some blacks do bad things so we should assume all blacks do bad things argument?

No, it is not at all similar:

1) People choose to be cops, are taught how and act accordingly; no one chooses to be black, and it requires no training nor behavior.

2) Many cops and a few entire forces have done and do bad things, for which their chosen profession grants unaccountability no black persons race similarly grants.

3) No whole chapters of black organizations have a POLICY of training all member in criminality and encouraging them to perform it.

4) When blacks are accused of a crime investigating authority is not restricted to OTHER blacks consequently inclined to exonerate their brothers whether or not justified.

That does not make ALL cops complicit any more than equally criminal acts by some blacks implicate all blacks, but cops who ARE guilty deserve no more impunity and no less accountability than guilty blacks or any other guilty party.

The COMPETITION is as you wrongly describe, yes, but that is why MAKING it a competition is so wrong: Every unarmed person cops shoot is ignored unless the victim is black; each and every one of THOSE shootings immediately becomes a media sensation because the usual suspects (pardon the pun) form into the usual camps, with one side automatically defending cops because the fact some blacks are criminals convinces them all are, and the other automatically defending cops because the fact some cops are criminals convinces them all are. The thing is, when police (or anyone) shoot an unarmed person, the victims RACE is irrelevant—or SHOULD be.


View original postCall me racist that is fine, better that being a thoughtless sheep to scared to accept logic and reason because it disagrees with what I have been told to believe.

Throughout this thread you have employed so little logic and reason, actively DEFIED both so much, it made Cannolis arguments read like the voice of moderate compromise, and he is not exactly the most agreeably compromising sort. I am not calling you a racist at all, but if you insist on shoehorning police brutality back into racial identity politics each and every time I try to pull it back into the nonpartisan public safety realm where it belongs, well... if the hood fits, wear it....

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
So Eric Garner's family is getting $5.9 million dollars. How awesome is that? - 16/07/2015 03:10:14 PM 893 Views
...? *NM* - 16/07/2015 07:09:33 PM 318 Views
we need to stop giving away millions tax dollars and calling it justice - 17/07/2015 01:14:39 AM 444 Views
IDK, I got the impression hustle was a good thing - 17/07/2015 12:42:07 PM 622 Views
I bitched about going Off-Topic the last time I posted on this board... - 17/07/2015 05:22:29 PM 601 Views
Are you being ironic? - 18/07/2015 01:14:07 PM 613 Views
So what do you think he would have doing for money without the tax? - 17/07/2015 05:39:33 PM 525 Views
Who cares? That's his business. - 18/07/2015 01:16:44 PM 613 Views
You seem to care since you brought it up - 18/07/2015 01:28:46 PM 591 Views
why only some child molesters? - 17/07/2015 05:40:21 PM 590 Views
That is two jobs, not one; also, the government does not lobby itself. - 17/07/2015 03:09:15 AM 512 Views
the silly "unarmed" argument - 17/07/2015 04:57:32 AM 582 Views
All I heard was "no one 'needs' guns." - 17/07/2015 10:59:40 AM 680 Views
See, these are tyranny, because the cops picked the fights. - 17/07/2015 02:09:21 PM 559 Views
Cops picked their fight with Garner, too: Why is that not tyranny? - 18/07/2015 03:33:52 AM 565 Views
Re: Cops picked their fight with Garner, too: Why is that not tyranny? - 18/07/2015 01:59:41 PM 593 Views
The above question remains, unanswered - 09/08/2015 04:20:37 AM 591 Views
Sorry but almost everything you said was wrong - 18/07/2015 02:48:44 PM 602 Views
... was exactly that. - 09/08/2015 04:23:54 AM 528 Views
Sorry but almost everything you said was wrong - 18/07/2015 02:48:45 PM 584 Views
OK Not an respond to what I said? - 17/07/2015 05:29:55 PM 590 Views
Sure it was: Since the unarmed and armed have equally lethal force, guns are needless - 18/07/2015 03:40:10 AM 531 Views
sorry I didn't realize you are using the some cops did bad things so all cops do bad things argument - 18/07/2015 01:56:31 PM 542 Views
No one said that, but arguing "most cops do nothing wrong so no cops do anything wrong" is false too - 09/08/2015 04:46:49 AM 675 Views

Reply to Message