View original post
Reading you statement you get the idea that Sneed is a jailhouse snitch but in reality he was an accomplish. The fact that there is no physical evidence tying Glossip to the murder is not on irrelevant but intentionally misleading. No one claims he was in the room during the murder so it is hardly surprising that there is no evidence he was in the room. He was embezzling so there is motive. Two different juries convicted him.
Reading you statement you get the idea that Sneed is a jailhouse snitch but in reality he was an accomplish. The fact that there is no physical evidence tying Glossip to the murder is not on irrelevant but intentionally misleading. No one claims he was in the room during the murder so it is hardly surprising that there is no evidence he was in the room. He was embezzling so there is motive. Two different juries convicted him.
then there must be a stay of the execution until there is or isn't certainty. Better 10 guilty men walk free than one innocent man die.
"His lawyers this week noted that the prosecutors themselves admitted in 2004 that “the physical evidence doesn’t directly implicate Mr Glossip”."
This to me would mean that the death penalty sentence must be stayed.
will an innocent man be executed tomorrow?
- 29/09/2015 10:52:46 PM
1692 Views
It is a travesty that should disgust every decent person who hears about it. *NM*
- 30/09/2015 01:20:20 AM
394 Views
*NM*
For those of you no paying attention moondog is full of shit
- 30/09/2015 08:55:43 PM
723 Views
Would you like to die on the word of one snitch who lowered his own sentence by implicating another?
- 30/09/2015 09:28:03 PM
671 Views
I actually don't support the death penalty in this or most cases
- 01/10/2015 02:01:04 PM
744 Views
Then actually have quite a bit of common ground. 
- 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
685 Views
- 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
685 Views
I'm not following the logical progression from "taxes" to "death." *NM*
- 02/10/2015 09:11:16 PM
395 Views
No? Hold a seance with Eric Garner's spirit. It might be able to clue you in.
- 04/10/2015 04:33:40 AM
681 Views
If there is reasonsable doubt, and there is,
- 01/10/2015 01:45:12 PM
688 Views
he was not convicted on physical evidence so why would expect it to link him?
- 01/10/2015 05:39:40 PM
685 Views
Bask in my new-found Golden Glory!
- 01/10/2015 05:39:48 PM
671 Views