Yes. It has proven to be wrong an incredibly high number of times. The number of just rape convictions overturned after DNA evidence was finally examined is astounding. And those are just the tiny number of older cases where it was still possible to test. Most times those men were convicted on one person's eye-witness testimony alone.
"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
-Samantha Jones, SatC
will an innocent man be executed tomorrow?
- 29/09/2015 10:52:46 PM
1605 Views
It is a travesty that should disgust every decent person who hears about it. *NM*
- 30/09/2015 01:20:20 AM
321 Views
*NM*
For those of you no paying attention moondog is full of shit
- 30/09/2015 08:55:43 PM
634 Views
Would you like to die on the word of one snitch who lowered his own sentence by implicating another?
- 30/09/2015 09:28:03 PM
582 Views
I actually don't support the death penalty in this or most cases
- 01/10/2015 02:01:04 PM
657 Views
Then actually have quite a bit of common ground. 
- 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
602 Views
- 01/10/2015 05:49:05 PM
602 Views
I'm not following the logical progression from "taxes" to "death." *NM*
- 02/10/2015 09:11:16 PM
320 Views
No? Hold a seance with Eric Garner's spirit. It might be able to clue you in.
- 04/10/2015 04:33:40 AM
594 Views
If there is reasonsable doubt, and there is,
- 01/10/2015 01:45:12 PM
600 Views
he was not convicted on physical evidence so why would expect it to link him?
- 01/10/2015 05:39:40 PM
583 Views
On basically eye-witness testimony alone?
- 01/10/2015 05:44:23 PM
583 Views
Bask in my new-found Golden Glory!
- 01/10/2015 05:39:48 PM
584 Views