Actually I did, maybe reading comprehension is not your strong suit *NM*
Roland00 Send a noteboard - 23/02/2016 01:59:36 AM
View original post
They brought up the exact same thing in Johnson's last year in office, saying that the incoming president should pick the new justice. They are hardly making up a new position.
They brought up the exact same thing in Johnson's last year in office, saying that the incoming president should pick the new justice. They are hardly making up a new position.
republicans ironically ask Obama to ignore Constitution
- 18/02/2016 07:29:28 PM
689 Views
Uh...
- 18/02/2016 08:32:02 PM
536 Views
Re: Uh...
- 18/02/2016 10:59:27 PM
614 Views
Get out the echo chamber. Only far left think republicans will be punished for not filling the seat *NM*
- 19/02/2016 02:07:08 PM
255 Views
Once again, are you insane, stupid or a liar?
- 23/02/2016 01:18:34 AM
565 Views
I believe part of this whole debate was...
- 23/02/2016 07:43:53 AM
487 Views
If you want to ignore precedents, maybe your argument starts to make a bit of sense...well, no.
- 23/02/2016 02:50:47 PM
585 Views
There is so much wrong with one of your statement
- 22/02/2016 07:32:16 PM
798 Views
You didn't cite examples of the last year of Eisenhower's presidency, which is the point
- 23/02/2016 12:56:36 AM
463 Views
Actually I did, maybe reading comprehension is not your strong suit *NM*
- 23/02/2016 01:59:36 AM
221 Views
I know numbers real good. Not one of the Eisenhower citations was in 1960, his last year in office. *NM*
- 24/02/2016 02:02:07 AM
226 Views
Democrats after years of being accused of ignoring the Constitution still have not read it
- 19/02/2016 02:05:07 PM
483 Views
Well, he's ignored it this long so he might as well keep ignoring it.
- 19/02/2016 06:54:02 PM
517 Views