Active Users:343 Time:03/05/2024 03:12:38 AM
EVERYTHING for the last year has been anonymous sources... HyogaRott Send a noteboard - 06/03/2017 09:49:27 PM

View original post
View original post
It was for phone taps, not a computer.
"[In June], the FISA court reportedly turned down the Obama Justice Department’s request, which is notable: The FISA court is notoriously solicitous of government requests to conduct national-security surveillance (although, as I’ve noted over the years, the claim by many that it is a rubber-stamp is overblown). Not taking no for an answer, the Obama Justice Department evidently returned to the FISA court in October 2016, the critical final weeks of the presidential campaign. This time, the Justice Department submitted a narrowly tailored application that did not mention Trump. The court apparently granted it, authorizing surveillance of some Trump associates. It is unknown whether that surveillance is still underway, but the New York Times has identified – again, based on illegal leaks of classified information – at least three of its targets: Paul Manafort (the former Trump campaign chairman who was ousted in August), and two others whose connection to the Trump campaign was loose at best, Manafort’s former political-consulting business partner Roger Stone, and investor Carter Page."

Now this is all from "anonymous sources" but so is most everything that is being leveled at Trump so...


That is some first rate cherry-picking, but nothing corroborates and a great deal refutes Trumps paranoiac fantasies about phone tapping him.

Checking a Pennsylvania computer for illegal foreign campaign donations to Trump underlings is NOT the same as tapping HIS phone in Trump Tower. Not even if he says it is; I can say the sun rises in the west, but that cannot make it so.


Reply to message
Trump wire tapping - 06/03/2017 02:36:15 AM 571 Views
It is an allegation, nothing more; even Trump has not offered ANY evidence - 06/03/2017 03:36:11 AM 702 Views
Ummm, try again - 06/03/2017 02:09:04 PM 554 Views
Even the lone unnamed source (i.e. The Guardians) does not corroborate Trumps claim - 06/03/2017 05:42:32 PM 699 Views
Keep trying - 06/03/2017 06:10:07 PM 424 Views
It is ONE anonymous source, who STILL never said, "phone tap," nor "Trump" - 06/03/2017 06:16:07 PM 590 Views
EVERYTHING for the last year has been anonymous sources... - 06/03/2017 09:49:27 PM 465 Views
anonymous sources are the new facts *NM* - 06/03/2017 09:59:06 PM 212 Views
It's just a baseless charge thrown out there to distract the press. - 06/03/2017 03:54:16 AM 474 Views
Yes and no - 06/03/2017 05:59:26 PM 560 Views
Philosophical question: if Trump isn't front page news, does he really exist? *NM* - 06/03/2017 06:18:19 AM 256 Views
That is when he is most real - 06/03/2017 06:03:11 PM 556 Views
Not far fetched. Obama did something similar to Merkel, did he not ? - 06/03/2017 08:34:40 AM 585 Views
It is not true until the NYT has an unnamed source *NM* - 06/03/2017 11:53:19 AM 255 Views
Actually, the whole thing is from one unnamed Guardian source (who did not say what Trump claims) - 06/03/2017 05:59:41 PM 587 Views
Source? *NM* - 06/03/2017 06:02:21 PM 201 Views
Sure; it is the one I linked in response to HyggaRott - 06/03/2017 06:08:29 PM 654 Views
So says the WP unamed source. And they call that fact checking - 06/03/2017 09:05:09 PM 480 Views
I watch too much "House of Cards".... - 06/03/2017 08:55:52 PM 509 Views

Reply to Message