Active Users:268 Time:06/05/2024 02:32:04 PM
this is why the writers of the Constitution didn't want to include a Bill of Rights damookster Send a noteboard - 23/03/2017 06:28:11 PM

The Constitution stated what the Federal government was empowered to do and just as clearly said that anything not specifically delegated to the central government was to be owned by the individual states. To the authors, that was perfectly clear and needed no embellishment.

Once you start spelling out what exactly is meant by the above via amendments, you are on the road to the Talmud.

Mook

*MySmiley*



"Bustin' makes me feel good!"

Ghostbusters, by Ray Parker Jr.
Reply to message
London yesterday, Antwerp today (thwarted by authorities)... - 23/03/2017 05:09:48 PM 505 Views
Funny... - 23/03/2017 05:30:24 PM 359 Views
This brings up an interesting thought.....(off topic) - 23/03/2017 06:06:54 PM 391 Views
this is why the writers of the Constitution didn't want to include a Bill of Rights - 23/03/2017 06:28:11 PM 344 Views
Bill of Rights vs. Enumerated Powers - 23/03/2017 07:13:30 PM 342 Views
I know it was almost 50 years ago... - 23/03/2017 07:35:23 PM 400 Views
Which brings to mind the falibility of man.... - 23/03/2017 08:34:07 PM 355 Views
yes - 23/03/2017 08:35:58 PM 404 Views
I would agree with that.... - 23/03/2017 10:01:38 PM 343 Views
Re: Bill of Rights vs. Enumerated Powers - 24/03/2017 10:56:12 AM 402 Views
Re: Letters of Marque and Reprisal - 24/03/2017 03:29:45 PM 323 Views
Re: Letters of Marque and Reprisal - 24/03/2017 06:12:10 PM 371 Views
the framers believee we should be well armed enought to be threat to government - 24/03/2017 01:14:13 PM 330 Views
I don't think it would have prevented anything. - 23/03/2017 07:59:35 PM 575 Views
I sort of assumed that those requirements were already in place - 23/03/2017 08:34:14 PM 337 Views
Sounds like he was kinda boring. - 23/03/2017 09:03:18 PM 328 Views

Reply to Message