If you cover another person, you get paid for another person. If they're satisfied that this kid is an exception to their numbers, what dastardly motivation do you attribute to them that would cause them to deny coverage? They're not evil just for the sake of being evil, y'know. You say they're using the numbers as an excuse, and that may well be, but why? I don't understand why a company would turn down the extra cash.
As health insurers escalate fight against reform, more bad PR... baby denied coverage, is too fat...
- 12/10/2009 08:14:31 AM
735 Views
that's ridiculous.
- 12/10/2009 01:02:52 PM
433 Views
This will probably be a mistake, as it usually is, but I'm going to play Devil's Advocate. 
- 12/10/2009 05:35:09 PM
507 Views
- 12/10/2009 05:35:09 PM
507 Views
the child has been declared otherwise healthy
- 12/10/2009 05:46:19 PM
425 Views
Er, but how is it for their own good?
- 12/10/2009 06:01:01 PM
410 Views
Choices..
- 12/10/2009 05:39:08 PM
407 Views
Apparently you didn't read my comments or the article.
- 13/10/2009 02:50:34 AM
428 Views
Apparently I didn't care to read your comments or the article.. at least get it right.
- 13/10/2009 03:17:50 AM
421 Views
Now.. my real answer.
- 13/10/2009 03:56:40 AM
473 Views
On the plus side, rates for the mother dropped substantially after she lost 18 pounds *NM*
- 12/10/2009 06:15:38 PM
167 Views