Active Users:246 Time:17/05/2024 04:46:03 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
And don't forget slave labor. lord-of-shadow Send a noteboard - 20/10/2009 04:28:21 AM
He was a major grower back in the day, although his was mostly of the hemp varienty. Funny how our first President was a criminal by our current laws.

I'm hopeful this is a step towards full legalization, at least in a few states. The entire plant is such a valuable resource, it's practically a crime that it can't be farmed as heavily as something like wheat.


Many for the founding fathers liked prostitutes, er companions too. :P
Reply to message
Obama for state's rights? Feds to issue new medical marijuana policy. everynametaken - 19/10/2009 10:46:57 AM 687 Views
Those Mexican cartels he talked about wouldn't be here if pot were legal. Tom - 19/10/2009 02:20:50 PM 268 Views
Libertarians and States Rights advocates (true Republicans) should support this as well!! imlad - 19/10/2009 05:09:11 PM 321 Views
One hopes this is a step towards fullscale legalization. The Shrike - 19/10/2009 02:38:38 PM 278 Views
Seriously why is the fed involved with this Roland00 - 19/10/2009 02:51:13 PM 279 Views
years ago the federal government declared a "war on drugs" LadyLorraine - 19/10/2009 03:25:38 PM 225 Views
the illegality of pot has been in place since before the "war on drugs" moondog - 19/10/2009 04:26:34 PM 291 Views
And it has been fought as ineptly and fruitlessly as the wars on poverty & terrorism. *NM* Cannoli - 21/10/2009 02:11:02 PM 104 Views
The fed isn't involved Tom - 19/10/2009 03:48:16 PM 276 Views
you have a point, but thats almost picking nits *NM* imlad - 19/10/2009 05:11:18 PM 97 Views
the DEA has marijuana as "schedule 1" making it as dangerous than heroin and crack moondog - 19/10/2009 04:24:03 PM 260 Views
Actually they made it illegal far earlier (1937), until the Supreme Court stepped in Roland00 - 19/10/2009 09:28:04 PM 242 Views
Because it's against the law Isaac - 19/10/2009 04:31:17 PM 273 Views
but some federal judges have given opinions that it should be legal moondog - 19/10/2009 04:42:15 PM 284 Views
Well, some judges... Isaac - 19/10/2009 05:10:03 PM 340 Views
Judges don't make laws. Screw 'em. Cannoli - 21/10/2009 02:21:39 PM 261 Views
Actually they do. snoopcester - 21/10/2009 02:32:38 PM 247 Views
Which is why they deserve to get put up against the wall. Cannoli - 21/10/2009 07:05:48 PM 368 Views
Such laws are illegal. Cannoli - 21/10/2009 02:21:07 PM 267 Views
Clearly they are legal Isaac - 21/10/2009 03:22:10 PM 216 Views
The Supreme Court's failure to exercise their suspect power of judicial review does not alter facts *NM* Cannoli - 21/10/2009 07:06:55 PM 89 Views
Excellent. LadyLorraine - 19/10/2009 03:26:59 PM 222 Views
I'd think George Washington would agree imlad - 19/10/2009 05:17:10 PM 258 Views
True. everynametaken - 19/10/2009 11:47:38 PM 249 Views
And don't forget slave labor. lord-of-shadow - 20/10/2009 04:28:21 AM 288 Views
I don't understand this. Sareitha Sedai - 19/10/2009 03:53:30 PM 268 Views
In those states the state law is at odds with federal law Brian - 19/10/2009 04:00:53 PM 243 Views
Yes. Sareitha Sedai - 19/10/2009 04:26:12 PM 272 Views
I had a feeling that's what you were saying.... Brian - 19/10/2009 05:08:00 PM 243 Views
*NM* Sareitha Sedai - 19/10/2009 05:20:03 PM 79 Views
reminds me of this bill hicks routine moondog - 19/10/2009 04:33:55 PM 321 Views
I never like that line of reasoning Isaac - 19/10/2009 04:43:25 PM 277 Views
<3 Bill Hicks! In a general sense, I didn't watch the link. *NM* everynametaken - 19/10/2009 11:49:05 PM 98 Views
A step in the right direction Hieshyn - 19/10/2009 09:34:37 PM 266 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes