Active Users:400 Time:01/05/2025 06:43:19 PM
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM
Falling in and out of Communion with various Anglican Churches isn't entirely new, although the Realignment does pose some very new problems. Still, it's the hyperconservative Anglicans who really are least likely to join the Roman Catholic Church. You're close about Anglican identity, but I think a better statement is "Most of what it emans to be Anglican is to see yourself as Not Catholic."

I still think schism is relatively unlikely. Impaired communion for the foreseeable future, though, I think is nearly certain.

EDIT: Part of the reason I find schism unlikely and joining the Roman Catholic church almost unthinkably improbable is the huge leeway various churches get. There's no real reason for Anglicans to convert en masse to Roman Catholicism when they can just leave the ECUSA and go to the Church of Kenya or the Southern Cone. That way they get to keep everything, including the name. There's just no real reason for Episcopalians to go Catholic when they can stay Anglican; either way, the authority goes overseas.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

This message last edited by Ghavrel on 26/10/2009 at 06:32:13 AM
Reply to message
Catholic Church reaccepting Anglicans allowing Anglicans to remain Anglicans in most things but name - 25/10/2009 11:15:50 PM 1085 Views
As you noted in your post, it's nothing new. And it's not likely to lead to much. - 26/10/2009 03:35:18 AM 727 Views
I don't know about that, some have already left the communion, and you may have a schism - 26/10/2009 04:27:01 AM 673 Views
As I said, Anglicans have a strong identity. - 26/10/2009 06:29:38 AM 649 Views
definitly agree about the episcoplians - 26/10/2009 01:14:53 PM 674 Views
Wouldn't you say not believing in transubstantiation is an important theological difference? - 26/10/2009 08:39:00 AM 657 Views
To the common man no, it isn't a major difference - 26/10/2009 12:07:25 PM 698 Views
Re: To the common man no, it isn't a major difference - 26/10/2009 04:55:51 PM 952 Views
I was going to mention that... - 26/10/2009 01:08:09 PM 663 Views
It should be noted - 26/10/2009 05:02:23 PM 655 Views
Catholicism = no ordination of women? - 26/10/2009 06:31:44 PM 680 Views
Re: Catholicism = no ordination of women? - 26/10/2009 07:40:45 PM 754 Views
Ah. You're an Anglo-Catholic, then? - 26/10/2009 09:41:03 PM 685 Views
I prefer Anglican Catholic - 26/10/2009 11:41:12 PM 676 Views
what about the congregations that have a woman priest? - 27/10/2009 03:56:45 PM 806 Views
Re: what about the congregations that have a woman priest? - 27/10/2009 04:37:16 PM 688 Views
Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, - 27/10/2009 10:31:02 PM 678 Views
Re: Calling women in the priesthood a Christological heresy is ridiculous, - 28/10/2009 01:26:24 AM 731 Views
So in sum your response is tradition - 28/10/2009 02:50:06 AM 684 Views
Not tradition, but Tradition (capital) - 28/10/2009 04:15:40 PM 901 Views
Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male - 28/10/2009 10:22:28 PM 781 Views
Re: Yes the priest class of both the old testatment and new testatment has always been male - 29/10/2009 09:02:36 PM 892 Views
Hun I am a former catholic - 29/10/2009 09:33:45 PM 677 Views
I am a former protestant - 30/10/2009 12:12:57 AM 875 Views

Reply to Message