Active Users:455 Time:02/05/2025 12:49:45 PM
True. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM
and they don't mention when his *first* child was born. the 80 year old may not be the firstborn after all...
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
112 year old man weds 17 year old bride - 30/10/2009 12:13:52 AM 915 Views
I sincerely doubt he is in fact 112. *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:36:29 AM 247 Views
the article says his oldest child is 80, he's probably pretty close... *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:45:40 AM 245 Views
I also sincerely doubt that. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:05 AM 213 Views
Also, if his oldest child is actually 80, I'd place him around 95. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:39 AM 223 Views
oldest is not the same as first - 30/10/2009 02:47:04 AM 495 Views
True. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM 243 Views
i am utterly disgusted *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:47:52 AM 202 Views
i am utterly envious - 30/10/2009 02:28:58 AM 600 Views
HI ADAM!!! *NM* - 30/10/2009 04:27:14 AM 226 Views
I knew you couldn't resist reading all my posts *NM* - 02/11/2009 12:41:05 AM 220 Views
I am utterly perturbed. - 30/10/2009 02:32:01 AM 588 Views
Lucky dog. - 30/10/2009 04:53:41 AM 569 Views

Reply to Message