Active Users:489 Time:13/12/2025 10:16:11 PM
True. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM
and they don't mention when his *first* child was born. the 80 year old may not be the firstborn after all...
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
112 year old man weds 17 year old bride - 30/10/2009 12:13:52 AM 1024 Views
I sincerely doubt he is in fact 112. *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:36:29 AM 288 Views
the article says his oldest child is 80, he's probably pretty close... *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:45:40 AM 286 Views
I also sincerely doubt that. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:05 AM 258 Views
Also, if his oldest child is actually 80, I'd place him around 95. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:39 AM 271 Views
oldest is not the same as first - 30/10/2009 02:47:04 AM 611 Views
True. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM 287 Views
i am utterly disgusted *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:47:52 AM 237 Views
i am utterly envious - 30/10/2009 02:28:58 AM 705 Views
HI ADAM!!! *NM* - 30/10/2009 04:27:14 AM 271 Views
I knew you couldn't resist reading all my posts *NM* - 02/11/2009 12:41:05 AM 276 Views
I am utterly perturbed. - 30/10/2009 02:32:01 AM 681 Views
Lucky dog. - 30/10/2009 04:53:41 AM 669 Views

Reply to Message