Active Users:831 Time:01/02/2026 09:51:07 PM
True. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM
and they don't mention when his *first* child was born. the 80 year old may not be the firstborn after all...
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
112 year old man weds 17 year old bride - 30/10/2009 12:13:52 AM 1050 Views
I sincerely doubt he is in fact 112. *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:36:29 AM 301 Views
the article says his oldest child is 80, he's probably pretty close... *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:45:40 AM 298 Views
I also sincerely doubt that. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:05 AM 270 Views
Also, if his oldest child is actually 80, I'd place him around 95. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:39 AM 283 Views
oldest is not the same as first - 30/10/2009 02:47:04 AM 642 Views
True. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM 304 Views
i am utterly disgusted *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:47:52 AM 251 Views
i am utterly envious - 30/10/2009 02:28:58 AM 734 Views
HI ADAM!!! *NM* - 30/10/2009 04:27:14 AM 284 Views
I knew you couldn't resist reading all my posts *NM* - 02/11/2009 12:41:05 AM 290 Views
I am utterly perturbed. - 30/10/2009 02:32:01 AM 708 Views
Lucky dog. - 30/10/2009 04:53:41 AM 702 Views

Reply to Message