Active Users:2571 Time:19/06/2026 11:55:16 AM
True. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM
and they don't mention when his *first* child was born. the 80 year old may not be the firstborn after all...
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
112 year old man weds 17 year old bride - 30/10/2009 12:13:52 AM 1135 Views
I sincerely doubt he is in fact 112. *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:36:29 AM 338 Views
the article says his oldest child is 80, he's probably pretty close... *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:45:40 AM 341 Views
I also sincerely doubt that. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:05 AM 305 Views
Also, if his oldest child is actually 80, I'd place him around 95. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:07:39 AM 315 Views
oldest is not the same as first - 30/10/2009 02:47:04 AM 728 Views
True. *NM* - 30/10/2009 02:49:06 AM 339 Views
i am utterly disgusted *NM* - 30/10/2009 12:47:52 AM 289 Views
i am utterly envious - 30/10/2009 02:28:58 AM 805 Views
HI ADAM!!! *NM* - 30/10/2009 04:27:14 AM 320 Views
I knew you couldn't resist reading all my posts *NM* - 02/11/2009 12:41:05 AM 323 Views
I am utterly perturbed. - 30/10/2009 02:32:01 AM 773 Views
Lucky dog. - 30/10/2009 04:53:41 AM 787 Views

Reply to Message