I always thought that was buggy, and not done on purpose. *NM*
Aemon Send a noteboard - 02/09/2009 01:20:51 PM
Even when there was only 5 or 6 people actually logged in, it still showed around "10,000" Active Users. He also claimed to show the number people to have loaded a page in the last 20 mins.
I show the number of "Active" users, which is the people who have loaded a page in the last 10 mins. Without any artifical inflation of the figures.
So that means, if you're reading a long article, link to another website, or generally take longer than 10 mins to click another link *even if you've got wotmania up and in front of you* it'll remove you from the active users.
I don't like lying to people, plain and simple.
I show the number of "Active" users, which is the people who have loaded a page in the last 10 mins. Without any artifical inflation of the figures.
So that means, if you're reading a long article, link to another website, or generally take longer than 10 mins to click another link *even if you've got wotmania up and in front of you* it'll remove you from the active users.
I don't like lying to people, plain and simple.
41 Active users. Wow. 'Nuff said. *NM*
- 02/09/2009 08:35:55 AM
404 Views
Y'know, Mike fiddled with the active user numbers.
- 02/09/2009 09:41:01 AM
529 Views
I think it's a pretty impressive number for the middle of the night
- 02/09/2009 09:45:32 AM
536 Views
I always thought that was buggy, and not done on purpose. *NM*
- 02/09/2009 01:20:51 PM
182 Views
If I manage to have wotmania up in front of me you really ARE a coding god. 
- 02/09/2009 02:45:30 PM
597 Views
- 02/09/2009 02:45:30 PM
597 Views