Active Users:778 Time:07/11/2025 01:34:01 AM
Whose complaint is valid? Legolas Send a noteboard - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM
I'm hoping you agree with me that calling the author of that reply "an Islamophobe" is idiotic and evidence of a mentality that's almost as black and white as what he's reproaching the "Islamophobes". Nitpicking about robbery or arson really doesn't change the validity of this guy's point.
Reply to message
All Terrorists are Muslims… except the 94% that aren’t. - 01/02/2010 10:42:12 PM 1890 Views
I find that unsurprising. - 01/02/2010 11:31:43 PM 547 Views
Lot of BS in there - 01/02/2010 11:33:08 PM 671 Views
I'm afraid I have to agree with this. - 01/02/2010 11:46:02 PM 616 Views
Well, no. Robbery accounts for a very small percentage of those attacks. Look at the chart. - 01/02/2010 11:50:39 PM 576 Views
I found the so-called Islamophobic reply... allow me to quote it in its entirety. - 01/02/2010 11:52:37 PM 595 Views
It's a valid complaint. *NM* - 02/02/2010 01:49:08 AM 229 Views
Whose complaint is valid? - 02/02/2010 01:55:58 AM 565 Views
Yours. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:15:01 AM 238 Views
I did note the rampant bias. - 01/02/2010 11:48:55 PM 679 Views
What about attacks on Iraqi police volunteers? - 01/02/2010 11:53:58 PM 580 Views
it only included attacks on American soil *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:16 PM 245 Views
Most of the Iraq violence isn't against the foreign occupier... - 01/02/2010 11:54:44 PM 607 Views
Ahem... /\ /\ /\ - 01/02/2010 11:56:34 PM 624 Views
Dude, 46 seconds. I was typing it while you posted. *NM* - 02/02/2010 12:05:44 AM 231 Views
True, but I was referring to attacks on US soldiers. - 02/02/2010 01:47:55 AM 575 Views
That's still a bad benchmark - 02/02/2010 10:00:23 AM 669 Views
You would be very wrong - 02/02/2010 02:11:08 PM 622 Views
Um, since when is all Mid-East terrorism against foreign occupiers? - 02/02/2010 12:33:13 AM 740 Views
I would agree with this. - 02/02/2010 02:33:47 AM 661 Views
It was bound to happen sooner or later. - 02/02/2010 04:10:13 AM 700 Views
This is the only problem I have with "definitions" - 02/02/2010 04:51:00 AM 574 Views
You're conflating two types of fighters who shouldn't be, I believe. - 03/02/2010 06:16:21 AM 561 Views
I think you missed the point. - 05/02/2010 05:15:40 AM 572 Views
One of us did. - 05/02/2010 08:26:07 AM 753 Views
I'm not talking ETHICALLY or MORALLY - 14/02/2010 06:41:32 PM 586 Views
I was, or at least speaking legally. - 15/02/2010 06:54:50 AM 630 Views
Churchill's justification of bombings cited civilians as the targets, IIRC - 03/02/2010 12:46:16 AM 768 Views
I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 03/02/2010 04:23:44 AM 718 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 05/02/2010 02:22:10 AM 905 Views
Re: I did say, "deliberately, " and for a reason. - 15/02/2010 09:46:48 AM 749 Views
Lame. - 01/02/2010 11:55:50 PM 524 Views
Demographics are the key, methinks. - 02/02/2010 12:20:46 AM 678 Views
WTF? Are these people serious? - 02/02/2010 02:19:05 AM 615 Views
Ah, good. I've driven you out of lurking. Now recommend me operas. *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:41:30 AM 229 Views
Huh? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:03:24 PM 247 Views
I made a survey on musicals and operas on the board! - 02/02/2010 05:15:45 PM 534 Views
I agree with tom - 02/02/2010 02:54:53 AM 577 Views
So what? - 02/02/2010 02:23:42 AM 622 Views
Waco were terrorist? Do they just make this crap up? *NM* - 02/02/2010 02:00:40 PM 431 Views
leftist dhimmi allies... rofl - 04/02/2010 04:56:48 AM 569 Views

Reply to Message