Active Users:572 Time:24/05/2026 06:31:41 AM
There were plusses and minuses to a decision either way. Joel Send a noteboard - 03/09/2009 10:47:08 AM
With the next book coming out very soon, we could have really used the newbies. I really wish we had kept WoT a bit more at the forefront , at least at first, so they won't all go to Dragonmount instead.

Ya pays yer money and ya takes yer chances. I still believe this is the biggest reason the links all redirect to Dragonmount, but on the other hand, why should a Pratchett fan, or Tolkien fan, or Martin fan who either never heard of or (worse) intensely dislikes WoT come to a WoT focused site? Five years from now we may be taking in Dragonmount refugees....

I really couldn't fault either decision, even if I would have preferred it went the other way.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Does anyone know why wotmania redirects to that Dragonmount and not here? *NM* - 01/09/2009 04:37:17 PM 603 Views
Because wotmania wanted to direct newcomers to a WoT dedicated site, I'd imagine. - 01/09/2009 04:41:31 PM 466 Views
Not bitchy enough. Fail. - 01/09/2009 05:15:49 PM 490 Views
Cause someone, I am not naming names... - 01/09/2009 04:41:33 PM 461 Views
ooh! I know this one! - 01/09/2009 04:45:16 PM 474 Views
- 01/09/2009 04:46:26 PM 420 Views
Damn! - 01/09/2009 04:51:13 PM 424 Views
Re: Damn! - 01/09/2009 04:52:39 PM 458 Views
- 01/09/2009 04:55:31 PM 373 Views
Don't give up! - 01/09/2009 04:55:16 PM 378 Views
I'm all out of ideas - 01/09/2009 05:14:17 PM 444 Views
Because once he made up his mind, there was no changing it. - 01/09/2009 04:42:50 PM 468 Views
I would speculate, but it might degenerate into namecalling - 01/09/2009 05:00:10 PM 439 Views
Dont worry. I'll do it for everyone involved. *NM* - 01/09/2009 05:21:55 PM 179 Views
Because Mike remained a bitter asshole to the very end. - 01/09/2009 05:20:56 PM 483 Views
Another reason may be that his friendship with Jason goes much further back than with most of us. - 01/09/2009 05:24:38 PM 504 Views
Thank you for the sensible answer, Burr. - 01/09/2009 06:12:15 PM 428 Views
We need to let things go. - 03/09/2009 10:50:54 AM 360 Views
That's true. But. - 05/09/2009 02:11:32 AM 376 Views
Labor Day is Monday; have a barbecue. - 05/09/2009 02:56:23 AM 437 Views
Well, the transition group asked if he'd at least consider it... - 01/09/2009 06:57:03 PM 536 Views
Re: Well, the transition group asked if he'd at least consider it... - 01/09/2009 07:00:25 PM 508 Views
Re: people - 02/09/2009 12:14:55 AM 402 Views
Nonsense. Insulting people endlessly is the best way to get them to do things! *NM* - 01/09/2009 08:51:18 PM 187 Views
Clearly *NM* - 01/09/2009 08:53:57 PM 172 Views
why does it matter, though? - 01/09/2009 05:56:22 PM 432 Views
Because we are going to need new members - 01/09/2009 06:06:52 PM 435 Views
we can't get new members other ways? *NM* - 01/09/2009 06:41:26 PM 184 Views
I'm sure we can - 04/09/2009 07:42:16 PM 380 Views
There were plusses and minuses to a decision either way. - 03/09/2009 10:47:08 AM 366 Views
Re: There were plusses and minuses to a decision either way. - 04/09/2009 07:38:55 PM 538 Views
Believe me, I understand your points. - 05/09/2009 02:55:03 AM 498 Views
We are just disapointed for the lack of acknowledgement of Bens hard work... - 01/09/2009 06:36:08 PM 406 Views
yeah, I see what you mean. Ben has done a lot for us - 01/09/2009 06:42:01 PM 487 Views

Reply to Message