Everyone I've ever known either says the as "thee" all the time, no matter what the word following it is, or the as "thuh", no matter the word.
But I'm not aware of any sort of rule or reason that decides it for me. Just whatever comes out of my mouth at any given time

I'm sure I do a fair bit of the (thuh) vowel-word distinctions though. "The (thuh) apple" sounds wrong to me, I'd say it as thee in that case.
*shrugs*
I'm less of a nazi when it comes to spoken language though...except for my pet peeves like "all intensive purposes"

Most people usually pronounce it one way or another, but rarely both ways.
A dog. Ay dog.
A dog. Uh dog.
You're just a freak.
I say "thuh" and "uh" almost all the time. Thinking on it, I may say "thee" apple, but I'm thinking I probably often don't.
I wish I usually used "thee" and "ay". It's definitely more "correct" I'm thinking.
"I'll blow whomever I want, whenever I want, as long as I can still breathe and kneel."
-Samantha Jones, SatC
-Samantha Jones, SatC
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
- 1285 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
- 547 Views
I pronounce it both ways
23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
- 541 Views
It's like "a".
23/03/2010 02:45:14 PM
- 638 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
- 517 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
- 505 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
- 464 Views
What Joe said, almost.
23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
- 717 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
- 353 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
- 291 Views
Never heard that one
23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
- 471 Views
Heh.
23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
- 591 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
- 565 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
- 297 Views
One is sufficient.
23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
- 690 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
- 658 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
- 570 Views

Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
- 452 Views

I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
- 541 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
- 742 Views
British English is weird oO
23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
- 554 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
- 661 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
- 510 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
- 472 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
- 611 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
- 480 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
- 539 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
- 421 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
- 529 Views
Even so.
23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
- 528 Views
I wasnt invited!
23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
- 522 Views
You were so.
23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
- 453 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
- 516 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
- 462 Views

Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
- 649 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
- 501 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
- 437 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
- 589 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
- 616 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
- 514 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
- 469 Views

Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
- 581 Views

*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
- 489 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
- 440 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
- 522 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
- 447 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
- 542 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
- 857 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
- 590 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
- 425 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
- 551 Views
konsekvent
23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
- 494 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
- 349 Views

Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
- 596 Views

Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
- 300 Views
Cool! I'm in!
23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
- 504 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
- 305 Views

I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
- 544 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
- 460 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
- 453 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
- 623 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
- 481 Views