Like a lot of English grammar rules, this is disappearing. Although, as a side note, The Ohio State University is always "THEE Ohio State University". I think people tend to emphasize "the" more if it is followed by a vowel, just by making the initial sound harder. "Thee" is more a word used for emphasis now, or so I've come to notice.
One other interesting word is: have. I hate the fact that it is pronounced as "haff" when you are discussing some necessary action. "I haff to go to the store" as opposed to "I have 20 dollars". I dislike doing things without thinking about them, and society has conditioned me to do this. I haff to not say haff anymore
One other interesting word is: have. I hate the fact that it is pronounced as "haff" when you are discussing some necessary action. "I haff to go to the store" as opposed to "I have 20 dollars". I dislike doing things without thinking about them, and society has conditioned me to do this. I haff to not say haff anymore

I do this, but never realized it till now. It IS funny how that stuff works, huh?
What is up with that Ohio State thing? Are they just that full of themselves? Makes me want to "dot the eye" with a right cross.

I hate when people say "should/would/could/must/etc of" instead of "should/would/could/must have".
As far as the OSU thing...I'm with you. I've never really had school patriotism, etc; however, I've been corrected when updating Faculty CVs that it is "THE Ohio State University", and never just "Ohio State University". So, for job security, I've sadly given in.

I wonder how Ohio University feels about this....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:06:02 PM
1356 Views
I've never heard of that in my life.
- 23/03/2010 02:29:37 PM
615 Views
I pronounce it both ways
- 23/03/2010 02:35:45 PM
605 Views
I have never actually heard anyone say "all intensive purposes".
- 23/03/2010 05:25:37 PM
581 Views
Really? I'd say most people say it incorrectly and most don't even know...
- 23/03/2010 09:35:49 PM
599 Views
Or irregardless. *shudders* I saw it in the dictionary but really...
- 26/03/2010 12:03:13 PM
529 Views
What Joe said, almost.
- 23/03/2010 04:51:08 PM
781 Views
Seems to me that only works if you pronounce "history" without the H. *NM*
- 23/03/2010 05:02:29 PM
379 Views
That's my point. I've never heard anyone say it without the "h." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 04:55:35 PM
317 Views
Never heard that one
- 23/03/2010 05:09:40 PM
564 Views
Heh.
- 23/03/2010 05:13:17 PM
689 Views
I speak mid-west English and have never said an history or ever heard anyone else use it.
- 23/03/2010 09:38:53 PM
645 Views
I've heard it spoken that way several times--on TV/radio by someone trying to be "serious." *NM*
- 24/03/2010 05:05:48 PM
321 Views
One is sufficient.
- 23/03/2010 02:30:53 PM
754 Views
Re: Do you really need to have two different pronunciations of "the"?
- 23/03/2010 02:46:41 PM
718 Views
As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
633 Views
- 23/03/2010 05:49:09 PM
633 Views
Re: As long as you don't say, "should of" 'cos then I must beat you.
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
513 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:09:27 PM
513 Views
Sounds like we're on thee same page.
- 23/03/2010 06:58:21 PM
667 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:58:21 PM
667 Views
I think that there are people who pronounce The with that convention
- 23/03/2010 02:47:59 PM
608 Views
Unfortunately you chose two very bad examples.
- 23/03/2010 02:48:42 PM
813 Views
British English is weird oO
- 23/03/2010 02:59:49 PM
621 Views
"y" is a consonant? or the "u" sound
- 23/03/2010 09:02:57 PM
723 Views
Whatever the nativespeakers say
- 23/03/2010 05:01:16 PM
578 Views
Do you mean "consistent"? If not, I can't work out what you mean by "consequent".
- 23/03/2010 05:05:38 PM
534 Views
I can testify that that one is a terribly annoying false friend in Dutch. And apparently in Swedish.
- 23/03/2010 05:10:03 PM
684 Views
What do people confuse "eventual" with? "Eventful"?
- 23/03/2010 05:12:02 PM
539 Views
You never realize even the most obvious of these things in your own language.
- 23/03/2010 05:16:35 PM
607 Views
"Gift" has amused me ever since I started learning German.
- 23/03/2010 05:39:48 PM
494 Views
Oh, it must be an incredibly important word to know when visiting Europe.
- 23/03/2010 08:12:19 PM
604 Views
Even so.
- 23/03/2010 08:29:52 PM
589 Views
I wasnt invited!
- 23/03/2010 09:04:16 PM
582 Views
You were so.
- 23/03/2010 09:05:58 PM
513 Views
No, I better finish my stupid essay!
- 23/03/2010 09:08:06 PM
583 Views
I can't imagine a world where that could possibly be as rewarding or invigorating as my company.
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
530 Views
- 23/03/2010 09:11:49 PM
530 Views
Nah, it's not about EFL, it's about Dutch-English false friends.
- 23/03/2010 05:17:28 PM
715 Views
Wait! The English eventual doesnt mean that?
- 23/03/2010 05:21:19 PM
564 Views
I think the English "eventual" applies to something that is more certain (or assumed) in the future
- 23/03/2010 05:25:39 PM
507 Views
How would you translate eventueel into English? "Potential"? "The possibility of"?
- 23/03/2010 05:23:58 PM
658 Views
I think I'd ditch the adjective and switch the sentence around to a different construction.
- 23/03/2010 05:33:19 PM
703 Views
Do you only use it for future? Or all possible things that may or may not be?
- 23/03/2010 10:27:16 PM
585 Views
Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
532 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:07:51 PM
532 Views
Re: Dutch is way closer to Norwegian than to Danish.
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
645 Views
- 23/03/2010 11:09:54 PM
645 Views
*nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:12:37 PM
565 Views
Re: *nods* Similar, but not the same, then.
- 23/03/2010 11:22:52 PM
508 Views
Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:28:01 PM
581 Views
tim might be able to answer that better than me, as he probably understands what you are referringto
- 23/03/2010 11:33:07 PM
522 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:39:37 PM
607 Views
Re: Isn't that T an adverbial marker, then?
- 23/03/2010 11:42:29 PM
947 Views
Nah, I know, that's why I said "eventuell" was a bad example - it makes no sense as a predicate.
- 23/03/2010 11:51:06 PM
656 Views
I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 24/03/2010 09:27:28 AM
492 Views
Re: I would come in and lay the smackdown, but unfortunately I have to leave in a few minutes.
- 25/03/2010 12:15:14 PM
603 Views
konsekvent
- 23/03/2010 06:22:26 PM
565 Views
We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
374 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 06:27:23 PM
374 Views
Re: We need to make a Dutch-Norwegian-Swedish mixture language to replace English, clearly.
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
668 Views
- 23/03/2010 06:28:47 PM
668 Views
Why dilute a perfectly good language with norwegian, dutch and austrian? *NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:12:40 PM
335 Views
Cool! I'm in!
- 23/03/2010 08:16:32 PM
564 Views
I've no doubt its grammar is awesome... making more sense, that sounds rather less likely.
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
329 Views
*NM*
- 23/03/2010 08:23:10 PM
329 Views
I don't, but I'm American, and apparently that makes the difference.
- 23/03/2010 05:55:10 PM
625 Views
Try it with a bunch of words starting with vowels, then.
- 23/03/2010 05:59:03 PM
525 Views
I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:05:53 PM
517 Views
Re: I don't know if we need to, but it would sound silly if we didn't
- 23/03/2010 06:26:30 PM
708 Views
Thuh is what most people I know use although I find that more educated people use thee at times.
- 23/03/2010 09:58:57 PM
547 Views

*NM*
*NM*