Active Users:186 Time:18/05/2024 06:35:53 PM
In the article I got it from Artsapat Send a noteboard - 24/03/2010 11:59:11 AM
The judge ruled that the girls First Amendment rights were violated, which sets a precedent for other schools. But he wouldn't order the school to hold a prom as he's got no legal basis to make them if they don't want to.


...said the school didn't have to host a new prom, because the parents had already organized an alternative prom on their own.
The mystery deepens... I think. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
So, I see the judge ruled in favor I the lesbian girl whose prom was cancelled. - 24/03/2010 07:38:13 AM 563 Views
I thought he judged against the lesbian couple - 24/03/2010 10:11:42 AM 462 Views
You're both right. - 24/03/2010 10:34:50 AM 391 Views
Ohh okay. *NM* - 24/03/2010 10:42:56 AM 149 Views
The judge has effectively struck down dress codes in public schools - 24/03/2010 11:43:39 AM 389 Views
well, given that it's simply a tux vs. a dress - 24/03/2010 12:15:08 PM 325 Views
Methinks you're extrapolating a little overmuch. - 24/03/2010 12:24:03 PM 424 Views
That's completely absurd - 24/03/2010 12:27:25 PM 383 Views
I look forward to it. *NM* - 24/03/2010 05:06:38 PM 148 Views
I want to see what an obscene tuxedo would look like on a woman..... - 24/03/2010 05:24:57 PM 455 Views
It's airbrushed on. - 25/03/2010 07:04:12 AM 293 Views
Rental fees may be, - 25/03/2010 07:20:27 AM 320 Views
that is excellent. *NM* - 25/03/2010 12:07:21 PM 150 Views
Oh, you could probably "make a deal. " - 29/03/2010 01:14:32 PM 300 Views
Oh, slippery slope fallacy, how useful you can be. *NM* - 24/03/2010 06:58:16 PM 164 Views
In the article I got it from - 24/03/2010 11:59:11 AM 336 Views
Excellent. *NM* - 24/03/2010 11:13:04 AM 159 Views
Yea but the damn school decided to cancel the prom - 25/03/2010 12:44:14 PM 327 Views

Reply to Message