The only reform needed is better screening to get rid of such people, and bring the American church back into line.

So it's okay for these people to still become priests, right?
And who decides when these things are now acceptable? Can you let me know, so we can keep an eye on them lest they decide pedophilia is okay? Anyway, if not-right urges still include the actual crime these priests are accused of, what is the point of all this? You say pedophilia is the result of men joining the priesthood to help suppress not-right urges, because of antiquated Catholic doctrine making them feel guilty about their perfectly healthy sexual inclinations, but then go on to say that they only unacceptable urges include pedophilia!

And what the hell good would that have done? According to the mandatory briefing by a government social worker on the topic of child abuse I had to attend as a teacher, the majority of child molestation is done by married, heterosexual men. I got news for you - for most perverts, the first inclination is NOT to bury yourself in the priesthood, it is to find a beard and live an apparently normal life. As the sola scriptura crowd would do, they take St. Paul's advice that it is better to marry than to burn. Imposing marriage on people who do not have a calling for it, in addition to the extreme logistical difficulties it would impose on the Church (and what do you do about sham marriages, where a priest with a natural inclination to chastity AND a gift for pastoral care pretends to be married so he can get a parish? ) and the conflict between sacerdotal and paternal duties, goes completely against religious and natural freedoms and law. There is a reason why the Roman Catholic Church is the largest and most widespread Christian denomination, and the Eastern bunch is a tiny nationalist church whose own leader is a Muslim vassal, despite their more powerful starting position.