From the sound of it, the D5000 is several hundred dollars cheaper and will better fit your needs at the same time.
D90: $1100-$1200
This price is for the kit, not just the body
A worthy, although pricey, successor to the highly rated D80, this is the first SLR with video capability. We found the HD video quality poor. It has excellent image quality when taking photos. Like its predecessor, it's very versatile with 11 AF points, making it well equipped to keep active subjects in focus. It also provides a top LCD panel, handy for displaying exposure info and camera settings. It's also one of the best basic SLRs for low-light shooting and has very long battery life. It offers a variety of post-editing modes, such as image cropping and contrast adjustments.
I have found the video to be without flaw. But maybe that's just me.
Don't ever use the post editing modes - that's why I have Photoshop
Highs - Excellent image quality. Can shoot HD video clips. Has max. ISO with best quality of 3200 ISO. VGA resolution LCD is very sharp and has live-view capability. Can shoot 4.5 fps, has 11 AF points and excellent battery life. Includes a hardware-based sensor cleaning system to keep dust off of sensor. Advanced features include vignetting and chromatic aberration correction and retouching options. It includes an HDMI out jack for connecting to an HDTV.
Lows - Expensive. Complex menus. Poor HD video quality. One of the heaviest basic SLRs.
I disagree with the lows. Yes, it's expensive, but it's not out of balance with other comparable cameras. They ALL have complex menus - but this camera has a very easy access to the stuff you use constantly on the top image display - ISO/White Balance/ Aperture and Shutter settings, exposure compensation.. and more.. all at a fingers touch w/out going into any settings at all.
Anyway, I know this has nothing to do with RT's questions, but I couldn't let this one go. I love my D90 too much to let it be slandered
D5000: $600
With its combination of liveview functionality, swiveling display, and ability to shoot HD-resolution video, this Nikon offers you a very intuitive way of taking video, as well as very good photos, with one device. It's also relatively inexpensive and better than most SLRs in low-light situations without a flash.
Highs - Moderately priced for an SLR with video capability. Very good image quality. Can shoot HD video clips (1280 x 720) but only at 24 fps, which is slower than most HD camcorders. Has max. ISO with best quality of 3200 ISO, which is better than most SLRs, including advanced models, for shooting in low-light situations without a flash. It has a swiveling LCD that drops down from the camera body, which is rare on most SLRs. Can shoot 4 fps and has 11 AF points, both of which can be useful when shooting action. Includes an HDMI output for HDTV so you can easily watch slide shows and video.
Lows - Shorter battery life than most SLRs we've tested. Menus are complex, which can confuse beginners. No live histogram, a feature that provides real-time exposure information.
Amy
formerly known as Amyrlin
Btw I miss you too ~ K.B. 1971-2006
formerly known as Amyrlin
Btw I miss you too ~ K.B. 1971-2006
need some help with a camera recommendation
- 14/04/2010 05:39:06 PM
657 Views
Camera stuff
- 14/04/2010 06:43:33 PM
517 Views
Consumer Reports Info for Amy's suggestions:
- 14/04/2010 06:54:54 PM
516 Views
Re: Consumer Reports Info for Amy's suggestions:
- 14/04/2010 07:36:50 PM
542 Views
Wow. So $600 is considered "entry level camera" here? *NM*
- 15/04/2010 12:35:08 PM
172 Views
Yes, when looking at SLRs
- 15/04/2010 12:40:27 PM
338 Views
a couple of slightly techincal questions
- 14/04/2010 06:58:33 PM
456 Views
I love my Nikon.
- 14/04/2010 06:46:11 PM
544 Views
those are awesome thanks
- 14/04/2010 07:01:56 PM
399 Views
I am looking to buy a macro lens.
- 14/04/2010 07:15:32 PM
414 Views
As much as I normally don't like aftermarket lenses
- 15/04/2010 02:59:09 PM
439 Views
I'll translate
- 15/04/2010 03:42:08 PM
502 Views
- 15/04/2010 03:42:08 PM
502 Views
LOL! Thanks
- 15/04/2010 04:11:50 PM
360 Views
- 15/04/2010 04:11:50 PM
360 Views
Re: LOL! Thanks
- 15/04/2010 04:38:51 PM
520 Views
- 15/04/2010 04:38:51 PM
520 Views
Re: LOL! Thanks
- 15/04/2010 04:55:36 PM
442 Views
- 15/04/2010 04:55:36 PM
442 Views
I tend to rate this guy's opinions, by the by:
- 14/04/2010 11:46:55 PM
692 Views
Okay. I'm not much of a photographer. But I do work in a photo lab so I do have helpful tips.
- 15/04/2010 03:35:50 PM
371 Views
stay away from olympus
- 15/04/2010 01:33:01 AM
509 Views
that seems to be the popular opinion
- 15/04/2010 05:28:50 AM
359 Views
I'm a Canon guy.
- 15/04/2010 02:15:38 AM
481 Views
The D5o00 or Canon do seem like the way to go
- 15/04/2010 05:23:39 AM
425 Views

