Active Users:423 Time:17/06/2025 03:06:10 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Obtaining it was wrong. Using it is not. *NM* Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 16/04/2010 01:07:35 AM
So, interestingly enough, this survey was inspired by a Star Trek episode I was watching the other night, and it got me thinking.

Anyway.

Suppose you've a friend or family member or other close relation-type who is dying. You have the knowledge that will save them, but you've obtained it in a completely unethical fashion (i.e. torturing other people, things like that). Is it wrong (ethically, morally, whatever) to use this knowledge and save your friend/family/etc?

I honestly don't know how I'd react in such a situation. I was completely torn when watching the episode, and would not have thought either decision to be wrong, really.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
An Ethical Survey Spriteling - 16/04/2010 12:48:44 AM 597 Views
Um nossy - 16/04/2010 12:57:16 AM 430 Views
no, using that information is not wrong *NM* LadyLorraine - 16/04/2010 01:00:09 AM 161 Views
not wrong. duh. *NM* Aeryn - 16/04/2010 01:02:30 AM 161 Views
Obtaining it was wrong. Using it is not. *NM* Ghavrel - 16/04/2010 01:07:35 AM 191 Views
Not a very tricky question, IMHO Isaac - 16/04/2010 01:09:45 AM 473 Views
I'd torture more people for fun after saving the friend or family member. Tom - 16/04/2010 01:25:43 AM 433 Views
Spoken like a true lawyer! *NM* rebelaessedai - 16/04/2010 01:49:14 AM 166 Views
Use it. rebelaessedai - 16/04/2010 01:48:49 AM 394 Views
So, like... using medical research acquired by Nazi scientists during the Holocaust? *NM* Mad Cow Bomber - 16/04/2010 04:34:32 AM 317 Views
Yeah, like that, pretty much. *NM* Spriteling - 16/04/2010 09:37:25 AM 166 Views
I can't think of many ethical considerations of any sort that would trump dying family member. *NM* Aemon - 16/04/2010 05:12:43 AM 162 Views
no damookster - 16/04/2010 05:26:01 AM 406 Views
What is done is done Bramhodoulos - 16/04/2010 09:19:45 AM 405 Views
This is a total no-brainer, as per above responses. Star Trek clearly needs better moral dilemmas. Tim - 16/04/2010 09:44:43 AM 385 Views
I think I did a slightly bad job of explaining it. Spriteling - 16/04/2010 11:56:14 AM 583 Views
The way you got it was wrong. But now you have it. So use it. ironclad - 16/04/2010 11:34:42 AM 372 Views
Sunk costs snoopcester - 16/04/2010 12:47:37 PM 506 Views
This question kind of raised it's head in a recent Bad Science column Mark - 16/04/2010 01:25:12 PM 501 Views
I think it would be unethical to let someone else die to protect your moral values *NM* random thoughts - 16/04/2010 02:16:54 PM 158 Views
Possibly not, but only if it would be immoral for your victims to refuse to cure your loved one. Burr - 16/04/2010 04:33:38 PM 410 Views
I have no ethics or morals or whatever. Kuke - 16/04/2010 05:47:56 PM 400 Views
I think I know the episode that prompted this. Dreaded Anomaly - 16/04/2010 09:28:55 PM 456 Views
That's a lot like a question I was asked recently. Dragonsoul - 16/04/2010 10:34:01 PM 418 Views
Re: An Ethical Survey Camilla - 18/04/2010 05:11:29 PM 412 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes