Active Users:985 Time:11/04/2026 10:16:04 AM
I can see that long-term, but the overlap of games I already own would be a huge rip-off. Zalis Send a noteboard - 17/06/2010 02:49:19 PM
Also, I'm wondering how this, if it gains a significant user base, would affect game sale calculations. Steam can track its purchases down to the exact number, and everything brick & mortar is reported back via vendors. Would OnLive then just gobble up bunches of licenses, estimating the demand?
The sword might be grateful to the forge fire, but never fond of it.
Reply to message
Continuing my personal publicity campaign, I remind you all that OnLive launches tomorrow. - 16/06/2010 05:06:21 PM 919 Views
Not yet interested, but watching. I'm curious about how game ownership will work. (or not) *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:33:38 PM 291 Views
In the worst case, you buy for full price and pay 14.95 to play. - 16/06/2010 08:24:30 PM 662 Views
I can see that long-term, but the overlap of games I already own would be a huge rip-off. - 17/06/2010 02:49:19 PM 648 Views
On the wait list... we'll see *NM* - 16/06/2010 08:37:25 PM 402 Views
I like the concept of OnLive - 16/06/2010 10:59:12 PM 779 Views
See my response to Zalis. - 17/06/2010 04:27:22 AM 809 Views
AT&T? Really? Good luck with that. *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:32:02 AM 290 Views
I like the concept... - 17/06/2010 03:46:58 PM 665 Views
Exactly my opinion. - 17/06/2010 06:38:57 PM 626 Views
Sure... - 18/06/2010 03:21:40 PM 682 Views
I'm on the wait list - still waiting *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:07:51 PM 312 Views

Reply to Message