Active Users:1576 Time:17/12/2025 04:13:32 AM
I can see that long-term, but the overlap of games I already own would be a huge rip-off. Zalis Send a noteboard - 17/06/2010 02:49:19 PM
Also, I'm wondering how this, if it gains a significant user base, would affect game sale calculations. Steam can track its purchases down to the exact number, and everything brick & mortar is reported back via vendors. Would OnLive then just gobble up bunches of licenses, estimating the demand?
The sword might be grateful to the forge fire, but never fond of it.
Reply to message
Continuing my personal publicity campaign, I remind you all that OnLive launches tomorrow. - 16/06/2010 05:06:21 PM 868 Views
Not yet interested, but watching. I'm curious about how game ownership will work. (or not) *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:33:38 PM 277 Views
In the worst case, you buy for full price and pay 14.95 to play. - 16/06/2010 08:24:30 PM 620 Views
I can see that long-term, but the overlap of games I already own would be a huge rip-off. - 17/06/2010 02:49:19 PM 601 Views
On the wait list... we'll see *NM* - 16/06/2010 08:37:25 PM 387 Views
I like the concept of OnLive - 16/06/2010 10:59:12 PM 733 Views
See my response to Zalis. - 17/06/2010 04:27:22 AM 770 Views
AT&T? Really? Good luck with that. *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:32:02 AM 273 Views
I like the concept... - 17/06/2010 03:46:58 PM 623 Views
Exactly my opinion. - 17/06/2010 06:38:57 PM 582 Views
Sure... - 18/06/2010 03:21:40 PM 643 Views
I'm on the wait list - still waiting *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:07:51 PM 289 Views

Reply to Message