Active Users:304 Time:29/04/2024 07:08:24 AM
I can see that long-term, but the overlap of games I already own would be a huge rip-off. Zalis Send a noteboard - 17/06/2010 02:49:19 PM
Also, I'm wondering how this, if it gains a significant user base, would affect game sale calculations. Steam can track its purchases down to the exact number, and everything brick & mortar is reported back via vendors. Would OnLive then just gobble up bunches of licenses, estimating the demand?
The sword might be grateful to the forge fire, but never fond of it.
Reply to message
Continuing my personal publicity campaign, I remind you all that OnLive launches tomorrow. - 16/06/2010 05:06:21 PM 684 Views
Not yet interested, but watching. I'm curious about how game ownership will work. (or not) *NM* - 16/06/2010 07:33:38 PM 203 Views
In the worst case, you buy for full price and pay 14.95 to play. - 16/06/2010 08:24:30 PM 448 Views
I can see that long-term, but the overlap of games I already own would be a huge rip-off. - 17/06/2010 02:49:19 PM 428 Views
On the wait list... we'll see *NM* - 16/06/2010 08:37:25 PM 319 Views
I like the concept of OnLive - 16/06/2010 10:59:12 PM 479 Views
See my response to Zalis. - 17/06/2010 04:27:22 AM 588 Views
AT&T? Really? Good luck with that. *NM* - 17/06/2010 12:32:02 AM 202 Views
I like the concept... - 17/06/2010 03:46:58 PM 445 Views
Exactly my opinion. - 17/06/2010 06:38:57 PM 414 Views
Sure... - 18/06/2010 03:21:40 PM 463 Views
I'm on the wait list - still waiting *NM* - 21/06/2010 03:07:51 PM 214 Views

Reply to Message