Active Users:319 Time:28/04/2024 06:29:17 AM
Hm. Aemon Send a noteboard - 06/07/2010 04:26:37 PM
is that they come rife with online-requiring DRMs, or require you to be hoooked up online in some other way. All the airports I connect to while travelling do not have free Wi-Fi. My uni's internet is abominable so if I was playing between classes, I'd probably constantly drop out and have to re-open the program (this is the main reason I don't play WOW at the uni).


Firstly, says who? I'm not aware of downloadable games requiring constant online access any more than disc-based games. The most popular download service requires a single online activation. Actually, the most recent game to require constant internet access was Assassin's Creed 2, as far as I know, and access was required of the disc version as well as the downloadable version. I'm not sure why you say downloadable games require constant online access more than disc-based games do.

I like CDs because most of them don't require this 24/7. And I like having a hardcopy that I can always play even if my computer explodes and there's no internet up at a friends' house. When they start making downloads do all this, I'll be much more interested.


This has been true in the past, but isn't really true these days. People think discs are easier because the old ones had no DRM. They think downloadable games are worse because they ALL have DRM. However, modern games are typically released with the same kind of DRM whether they're on a disc, or available by download. Because of this, you often CAN'T take your disc to a friend's house and play, if he has no internet.

Nonetheless, I do still admit that, with currently available technology, it's easier to take a disc to a friend's house than to bring your digital copy. Bringing your digital copy requires either burning a disc (something lots of people aren't comfortable with), putting it on a flash drive (more expensive), or transferring the game over the internet in some manner (subject to the USA's poor network infrastructure).

TLDR: I don't agree with your arguments because the modern game DRM gap between disc and download is slim, if it even exists. However, discs are currently better than digital because they're currently the easiest/most cost effective method of transporting very large files.
Reply to message
Most console gamers still prefer discs over downloads - 05/07/2010 04:58:40 AM 956 Views
For consoles, I definitely prefer discs. I can take it to a friend's house, not fill up my harddrive - 05/07/2010 05:45:22 AM 480 Views
Oh, yes. Steam is awesome - 08/07/2010 07:39:39 AM 589 Views
I prefer discs for consoles, but downloads for my PC. - 05/07/2010 06:20:47 AM 474 Views
Makes sense - 08/07/2010 07:42:42 AM 559 Views
Yeah I definitely prefer a disc - 05/07/2010 10:45:50 AM 494 Views
- 08/07/2010 07:45:02 AM 524 Views
I concur that I would never pay $59.99 for a game download. - 05/07/2010 03:08:29 PM 536 Views
*nod* - 08/07/2010 07:48:01 AM 559 Views
Discs for sure. I don't see them EVER going away. - 05/07/2010 09:40:15 PM 558 Views
I'm the same way - 08/07/2010 07:51:32 AM 556 Views
Unsurprising. Console games are supposed to be portable. *NM* - 06/07/2010 12:58:30 AM 234 Views
I like downloads, but I'm an extremely casual gamer - 06/07/2010 01:16:23 AM 544 Views
I never said gamers don't prefer discs. I just said it's not the plastic that they like. - 06/07/2010 01:50:08 AM 532 Views
my biggest problem with net-accessibility... - 06/07/2010 02:20:18 AM 475 Views
Hm. - 06/07/2010 04:26:37 PM 451 Views
really? when I was using steam for a short bit... - 06/07/2010 04:29:06 PM 522 Views
It does, but you can switch it off. - 06/07/2010 11:58:19 PM 505 Views
hmm, I didn't see that. Thanks *NM* - 07/07/2010 01:58:36 AM 231 Views
Re: Hm. - 08/07/2010 07:36:16 AM 584 Views
Pssh - 08/07/2010 08:02:31 AM 474 Views
Physical copies all the way. - 06/07/2010 11:07:55 AM 480 Views

Reply to Message